[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Excessive crosspostings
- To: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Excessive crosspostings
- From: "Constantine S. Chassapis" <cschassapis@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:46:35 +0200
- Cc: <icann-europe@fitug.de>
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- References: <20001114104032.F10379@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org> wrote:
> For your information: Messages which have overly long header fields
> are routinely blocked by majordomo (sample included). I'm not going
> to approve such messages for forwarding to the list, as I'm
> considering them excessive crossposting.
I agree.
> Additionally, someone has asked me whether or not it's sensible to
> think about a stricter posting policy, given the rush of
> crosspostings in the recent past. I think it is.
I agree.
> - Match messages to, say, 10 or 15 addresses in one header, and
> block them - with the option to approve messages which look
> legitimate. This could easily be implemented, and would have few
> effects on legitimate discussions. Additionally, I could still
> approve messages which have just collected an impressive number of
> CC recipients due to people using group-reply. I'd suggest we
> implement this.
I agree.
> - Block messages crossposted to the domain-policy list. That list
> has a "restricted posting" policy anyways, so replying to such
> crosspostings won't make any sense for many of the subscribers to
> icann-europe. I'd _strongly_ suggest to implement this measure.
I agree.
Constantine Chassapis