[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[icann-eu] Re: [ICANN-EU] Excessive crosspostings
- To: <icann-europe@fitug.de>
- Subject: [icann-eu] Re: [ICANN-EU] Excessive crosspostings
- From: "Alan Lenton" <alan@ibgames.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:49:48 -0000
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- References: <20001114104032.F10379@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Well I for one would definitely like to see less cross posting.
You have my support for the last two options.
Alan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
To: <icann-europe@fitug.de>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 9:40 AM
Subject: [ICANN-EU] Excessive crosspostings
> For your information: Messages which have overly long header fields
> are routinely blocked by majordomo (sample included). I'm not going
> to approve such messages for forwarding to the list, as I'm
> considering them excessive crossposting.
>
> Additionally, someone has asked me whether or not it's sensible to
> think about a stricter posting policy, given the rush of
> crosspostings in the recent past. I think it is.
>
> Options we have include these:
>
> - Restrict posting to those subscribed to the list. This may help
> to cut off threads evolving from such cross-posting. However, it
> will also have adverse effects on legitimately cross-posted
> discussions. I'd advise against this.
>
> - Match messages to, say, 10 or 15 addresses in one header, and
> block them - with the option to approve messages which look
> legitimate. This could easily be implemented, and would have few
> effects on legitimate discussions. Additionally, I could still
> approve messages which have just collected an impressive number of
> CC recipients due to people using group-reply. I'd suggest we
> implement this.
>
> - Block messages crossposted to the domain-policy list. That list
> has a "restricted posting" policy anyways, so replying to such
> crosspostings won't make any sense for many of the subscribers to
> icann-europe. I'd _strongly_ suggest to implement this measure.
>
> Obviously, this won't work against determined noise-makers and
> multi-posters, but it may help to make things a bit more difficult
> for them. ;-)
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>