[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: [icann-eu] 10.000 PIN codes found....
- To: Harald Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
- Subject: Re: AW: [icann-eu] 10.000 PIN codes found....
- From: Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 12:13:52 +0100 (CET)
- cc: Christian Schultz Kommunalberatung <SchultzKom@t-online.de>, icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001121104940.070e6cc0@127.0.0.1>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, at 10:52 [=GMT+0100], Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> At 17:57 20/11/2000 +0100, Christian Schultz Kommunalberatung wrote:
> >thanks for your looking into ICANNīs office. It has confirmed my thought
> >that there must be a great disorder in this office. Meanwhile Iīm not more
> >surprised about this because I have some months experience with the ICANN
> >staff. With 60.000 not activated memberships there rests no doubts who could
> >solve this problem for these members.
>
> Christian,
> when you say like this, I start wondering whether I should have kept my
> mouth shut.
Certainly not! Mike Roberts has already refuted the claim of disorder
on this list, in an open manner informing us what ICANN was doing with
the returned PINs.
> The fact that 10.000 addresses out of 140.000 could not be resolved by the
> postal system does NOT say anything about the order or disorder in the office.
Indeed.
> It ONLY says something about the quality of the addresses that made their
> way onto envelopes.
This, however, is just as much a non sequitur. Let us hope everything
will be clear after the At Large study.
--
Marc Schneiders (rest in header)