[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [icann-eu] Re: 10.000 PIN codes found....
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [icann-eu] Re: 10.000 PIN codes found....
- From: "Karl Kramer" <Karl@KarlKramer.de>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:41:42 +0100
- CC: Christian Schultz Kommunalberatung <SchultzKom@t-online.de>, ajm@icann.org
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-reply-to: <20001122103802.B2213@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
- References: <3A1B0C5C.26018.4B51F6@localhost>; from Karl@KarlKramer.de on Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:59:24PM +0100
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
> How strange, then, that so many people managed to get their
> addresses entered in a proper way, and actually were able to vote...
Between all the System-Failures !
It took me a lot of tries for every step,
maybe because I was under the first who tried.
> Or do you want to imply that it takes a normal individual looks at a
> couple of different web forms, and repeated submission of these
> forms, to generate a correct address?
When someone waits for his letters he should be able to check his data.
Yahoo has the same problem at the moment: if your data is corrupted
from being on thier computers for several years,
you have serious stress to get in contact with someone who can fix it a
way that allows you to fix the rest.
> > I think ICANN should simply be closed down and replaced by
> > adhoc-groups, for which ONLY non-profits are allowed to join, no
> > governmental, (e)commerce or provider-peoples !
>
> This will most likely be the best method to get the admin community
> accept whatever root such an organization would propose. You are
> joking, aren't you?
No, as the Admin's are the "Slaves", not those who should be the roulers.
Peoples who are not fixed to their boss can easier make correct descisions.
I had a lot of "fun" with a wellknown admin, who did not even know what some network-
hardware can do, with the orgiginal test-software installed.
> > The central-office should be in Genevre or Berlin, in the USA
> > they are even unable to vote a President without having serious
> > counting-problems...
>
> While the presidential elections are certainly excellent joke-fodder
> (two distinct versions of the "revocation of independence" are
> available upon request), they should not be taken as a reason for
> any national or continental hybris and arrogance. This just won't
> help in any manner.
They are a sign, a Nation that is unable to perform an election
and that also accepts "special" peoples to pump a lot of money
into a parties portefeuille should not host Institutions
that need international acceptance.
ICANN is worth nothing from the moment sufficent peoples
decide to ignore it. Think about that.
We all know where the Net would be without HTML
and we all know were HTML was born and who paid for that,
so ICANN should be located on that side of the ocean.
> Apart of that, I suppose there is some consensus forming by now that
> the - ICANN, not presidential ;-) - elections had serious problems
> which should be investigated during the study to come, and that all
> parties involved should work to get these problems fixed the next
> time ICANN calls for elections.
Ok, the ICANN Elections were not perfromed adequate
but are still OK within the Margins.
I think the "unelected" ones of the ICANN Directors should be dumped asap,
in order to smaller the gremium and ease its work.
The US-Elections have a result smaller than the error-count,
i would not call them OK, but redo them, and this time
without Money from "special" Peoples.
Best also with new candidates,
i would prefer a black woman or an Indian as US-President !
Regards,
Karl