Re: [icann-eu] Does the ICANN legally exist (this is not a joke)?

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Jefsey and all,

Jefsey Morfin wrote:

> Jeff,
> I certainly agree with you about informing your destinees of this
> interesting thread. I would have preferred you do it in sending my
> initial post (but may be you did? then I would apologize) rather
> than a presentation making me to support the very ideas I fight.

  Apology accepted.

>
>
> I had then to inform the destinees of the true nature of my thinking,
> since obviously Peter de Blanc (and probably the others) had been
> misinformed by Alexander's reading.

  I don't see any indication that anyone was mislead by Alexanders
reading.  Rather I did sense that your idea was overly centered on ccTLD
registries representation, and leaves out gTLD registries for the most part.
You later somewhat corrected that.  But it is still unclear.

>
>
> The Californian law gives the interesting opportunity to use the
> GA as an *additional* instance, with powers and duties in areas
> of cc/gTLDs concerns and usual limitations otherwise.

  The GA?  Do you mean the ICANN/GA or the DNSO GA?  Please
be specific.  One is vastly different than the other.

>
>
> Proposing to cleverly use that possibility purportedly prepared
> (yet overlooked) by the "Membership analysis" discussion is by
> no means "handing the ICANN to the ccTLDs" !!!

  I never thought your idea was "handing the ICANN to the ccTLDs",
but was leaving out the gTLD registries and hence the vast majority of the
stakeholders.  In addition the percentage of the representation on the
ICANN board for the ccTLD's was too small given the amount of the
budget that the current ICANN board is demanding from the ccTLD's
presently.  These were my points and concerns as to your idea.

>
>
> It is the *absolute* contrary! It is making an internal cooperation
> attractive enough to ccTLDs for them to fully cooperate and develop
> the ICANN as the stakeholders' "common house".

  Again you leave out the gTLD's Jefsey.  Why?

>
>
> Jefsey
>
> At 21:26 08/12/00, Jeff Williams wrote:
> >Jefsey and all,
> >
> >You Jefsey, are free to disagree with whomever and whatever you like,
> >as are others, of course.  I for one, do not see where I caused any confusion
> >of any kind.  Rather, I believe that I was simply more broadly informing
> >others of this threads discussion points that were good ones that needed
> >airing out a little.
>
> <snip>
>
> >Regards,
> >
> >--
> >Jeffrey A. Williams
> >Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
> >CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> >Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> >E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> >Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
> >Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208