[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ICANN-EU] [pcg@goof.com: Re: what is your point?]
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: [ICANN-EU] [pcg@goof.com: Re: what is your point?]
- From: Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 18:07:55 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Mail-Followup-To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
<amused>After Andreas Fuegner finally managed to mail his - formerly
private - questions to the list, here are the answers I sent to
him.</amused>
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 05:25:24PM +0200, Andreas Fügner <Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com> wrote:
> >ICANN so far decided to add new TLDs in a slow process, one at a time.
> "First
> >come - First serverd" does IMHO not apply to such a model, where
> introduction
> > of new TLD's is a long process.
> > Of course, ICANN can change this, but adding new TLD's on a rush is
> > serving nobody :(
>
>
> What is your point?
That FCFS is a bad policy.
> If a trademark owner wants your domain, it has to defend
> its trademark. And yes the plaintiff picks the first court. That is how
> the legal system works.
Yipp.
> Now here is some constructive criticism. But who can
> check and judge, whether a domain is in use?
Well, I have some ideas. Maybe you can contribute even more?
> There are indeed international trademark agreements.
> Unfortunately, some countries did not to sign them yet.
Which define borders the internet does not and must not obey.
> The internet raises new legal questions.
> But ICANN is not the entity to solve them.
No, but ICANN has to work in accordance to (some) national laws.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@opengroup.org |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|