[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] more questions: Future of the DNS?
- To: Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] more questions: Future of the DNS?
- From: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:00:23 +0200 (MEST)
- cc: Andreas Fügner <Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com>, icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <20000814144527.C13131@cerebro.laendle>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 02:05:45PM +0200, Andreas Fügner <Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com> wrote:
> > Dear Marc:
>
>
> couldn't you add "Schneiders"? I can see a potential naming conflict here...
In theory, Marc, and perhaps for other issues. It seems we, Marc and Marc.
agree about the sheer stupidity (no apology!) of the number idea.
> > >Random numbers are nonsense, sorry. You cannot remember them at all. It
> > >would be much better to use third level domains under memorable second
> > >level domains.
> >
> > What is wrong with telephone numbers?
>
> Nothing: 0800-dial-me-now ... absolutely no problems ;=> To be less
> cynical, phone numbers are difficult to remember, that's why we look
> up phone numbers by yellow pages for example (could it be that this is
> actually what dns does? woaw ;)
And if you really want to have a huge quantity of addresses, use letters
not numbers. There happen to be more of them.
--
Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl
marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org
ICANN @large: http://www.abunde.net/