[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Re: questions for candidates
- To: Florian Laws <Florian.Laws@gmx.de>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Re: questions for candidates
- From: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 08:49:44 +0200
- Cc: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <7328.966274482@www17.gmx.net>; from Florian.Laws@gmx.de on Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 07:34:42PM +0200
- References: <slrn8pg557.su.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de> <7328.966274482@www17.gmx.net>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 07:34:42PM +0200, Florian Laws wrote:
> > * Marc Schneiders wrote:
> > >Since ICANN board members are expected to have some technical knowledge
> > >why not persue this matter a little further? Can you explain how you
> > would
> > >do this "accounting"?
> >
> > Every request can be logged or counted. No problem.
>
> How do you deal with caching name servers that effectively hide requests
> from the accounting servers?
Based on statistical estimates. The same procedure is used for representative
hit counters of web pages.
Obviously there is a solution to get every hit (set the TTL to less than 10),
but this is as anti social as the misuse of the Expire HTTP Header.