[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ICANN-EU] Re: nomination proceeding
- To: "Henning Fischer" <Henning.Fischer@gmd.de>
- Subject: [ICANN-EU] Re: nomination proceeding
- From: "Andreas Fügner" <Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:46:17 +0200
- Cc: <icann-europe@fitug.de>
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Dear Henning:
>I do not think it is very useful to focus the debate on the
>question whether there should be two or more self-nominated
>candidates for the ballot. Andrew is right when he says that
>the whole election (and nomination) process bases on debates
>long time ago. I agree with what Lutz mentioned in one of his
>first mails:
>
>"Europe and North America should be able to nominate candidates
>themself. But it happend and we have to live with."
>
>If someone feels unhappy with this result, he or she should
>have reacted a bit earlier.
May I disagree?
The decision to place the ICANN nominated candidates ahead of
member nominated was made in or after Yokohama.
For a brief while I thought like you: That is it, live with it.
As ICANN provides a procedure exactly for cases like this,
what is wrong using it?
Andreas Fuegner