[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ICANN-EU] Horizontal organization



Adrian,
>At 19:47 18.08.00 +0200, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>>About the community, this is why I propose that this advisory board is
>>formed by the top 15-25 candidates in this phase of the elections. It's 
>>the
>>only instrument we have to measure their representativeness inside the At
>>Large community.
>
>I have to disagree. The candidates have agreed to be candidates for the
>ICANN directory, not for an advisory board. Those who did not take part in
>the self nomination did so because they did not want to become ICANN
>directors (or thought they would not succeed anyway, so why bother trying),
>but they never said that they would not be willing to become member of an
>advisory board.


In principle, you are right.
In practice, how can we think of organizing another round of elections for 
the Advisory Board, without even having the list of members?

Indeed, there is the need for a small group to get the ball rolling.
It can either be the top (nn) candidates, or something else, but we have to 
start an "interim" structure from somewhere.

And the top candidates seems to me to provide better "representativity" than 
picking at random.

Regards
Roberto


________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com