[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] The real challenge for all of us as candidates
- To: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] The real challenge for all of us as candidates
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 18:44:02 +0200
- Cc: Christoph <cweber@dialup.nacamar.de>, Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>, icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008221832550.28883-100000@s025.widexs.nl>; from marc@venster.nl on Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 06:39:08PM +0200
- Mail-Followup-To: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>,Christoph <cweber@dialup.nacamar.de>,Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>, icann-europe@fitug.de
- References: <20000822165003.J4374@sobolev.does-not-exist.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008221832550.28883-100000@s025.widexs.nl>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.7i
On 2000-08-22 18:39:08 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> Huh? The UDRP is ICANN "law"! ICANN approved WIPO to do the
> arbitrations under the ICANN UDRP. So ICANN is responsible for
> what WIPO is doing. It cannot deny that. Not even a hypocrit
> could deny that. (Not saying you are one :-)
Obviously, nobody can be forced to use UDRP. This implies that
national trademark law is still applicable.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>