[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] UDRP
- To: vb@vitaminic.net, svensson@icannchannel.de
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] UDRP
- From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:28:06 CEST
- Cc: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Vittorio,
>
>On the other hand, I'm sure that there must be some space (= TLDs) where
>individuals and organizations can stay sure that no big business will come
>and claim trademark issues to take their domain away ;-)
The only reason for the introduction of new TLDs is, to me, to provide
diversification of the offer, in terms of econmical models
(for-profit/non-for-profit Registry, for instance), in terms of tecnical
solutions ("Thick Registry" vs. "Thin Registry", for instance), in terms of
geographical distribution of the Registries, and also in terms of policies
for trademark protection and dispute resolution.
This was the line I followed in my comments to ICANN when the matter was in
public enquiry. Full details on my Website - url not provided to avoid being
accused of campaigning ;>).
If new TLDs are introduced without keeping this in mind, the operation will
have an almost zero added value for the users (unless you believe that
adding new TLDs will allow to better locate resources on the net, but this
has been already debated).
To the point of UDRP, if no TLD with a clear policy "trademarks not
protected here" will be delegated, we would have lost a chance.
And credibility too.
Regards
Roberto
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com