[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Answer to Joop Teernstra by a candidate
- To: Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Answer to Joop Teernstra by a candidate
- From: Alf Hansen <aha@uninett.no>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 22:40:36 +0200
- CC: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Organization: UNINETT FAS
- References: <F307nHM3SOlbpH71yEX000010f0@hotmail.com>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Roberto,
I have to make a comment of this one,
Roberto Gaetano wrote:
...
>
> About the number of DNSO Directors, may I just notice that we are taking the
> risk of having AtLarge Directors that are just DNSO Directors in disguise:
> see the list of NomCom candidates. With all due respect to Alf, Olivier, and
> the others that I don't know, all five belong to groups represented in the
> DNSO Constituencies, and could easily be elected as DNSO Directors.
>
...
I think you are using the wrong description. An ICANN Director should
know as much as possible about every aspect of ICANN, including ASO,
PSO, DNSO and At-Large. So far I have toutched PSO, DNSO and At-Large,
but I know very little about ASO. And that is a shame.
As I have said before, an ICANN Board Member is personal responsible and
must work for the best of ICANN as a whole, and not just for one
constituency in DNSO or one group of At Large members. A board member
represents himself (herself) and not certain groups, even if she (he)
has support from various groups of people.
Therefore I do not understand the term "DNSO Directors in disguise".
I would rather prefer to be confronted with questions like:
- How can you as a manager of a ccTLD do something good for the At-Large
membership?
Best regards,
--
Alf Hansen Mail address:
UNINETT FAS A/S
aha@uninett.no N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
Home page: Phone: +47 73 55 79 00
http://domen.uninett.no/~alf/ Fax: +47 73 55 79 01