Re: [ICANN-EU] A specific question for Lutz D

[Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>]

On 4 Sep 2000, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:

> * Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >On your candidate website you mention that "WE (you and your employer IKS)
> >are conservative in DN issues."
> >
> >Can you please make it clear what you mean by that?
> 
> If a customer wants more than a (2nd level) domain name, he usually get it
> only after a longer discussion if it is really necessary or not. Our prices
> look high enough to prevent extensive domain grabbing.
> 
> Even if a customer insists on a *.org or *.net domain, he usually has to
> answer the question why he assume to be a international NGO or provider. :-)

In another message you admitted your knowledge of IPv6 was outdated. It
seems the same is true for the policies about type of organiztion and com
versus net and org. They were changed long ago. 1997?

Does "conservative" mean you stick to outdated specs and
discontinued principles?

> Of course, in the last instance a customer get what he wants, but it is not
> as easy as expected.

Is this necessary? Don't they just go elsewehere or have you got a
monopoly? :-)
--
Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl 
 marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org