[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ICANN-EU] ICANN service fee



Dear Jeff, dear Marc:

I did not see ICANN call it a tax.
It is a service charge. ICANN
opens its books to everyone in
an understandable way. Thus,
there is little room for cheating.

ICANN needs funding and
I rather have an open service charge
than hidden sponsorships or
lobbying money from unknown
people channeled through law firms
or other "non-profit" organizations.

Andreas Fuegner



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
An: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
Cc: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>; icann-europe@fitug.de
<icann-europe@fitug.de>; commerce <commerce@mail.house.gov>; Phil Gramm
<phil_gramm@gramm.senate.gov>; Becky Burr <bburr@ntia.doc.gov>; Barbara
Simons <simons@acm.org>; Nick Jesdanun <njesdanun@ap.org>; Richard K. Armey
<tx26@legislators.com>
Datum: Dienstag, 12. September 2000 10:27
Betreff: Re: [ICANN-EU] Re: Don't waste your endorsement


>Marc and all,
>
>  The Tax that ICANN is attempting to levy is not legal in all
>countries.  The US for instance.  Taxation without representation
>is not legal as I said and is unnecessary as a means of funding
>for ICANN.  We have been here before with ICANN and their
>wanting to TAX the internet in some fashion.  The US Congress
>nixed any taxes on the internet for several years.  How or why
>the ICANN board believes with the Registry agreement that it can
>sneak this TAX by again is beyond me....
>
>Marc Schneiders wrote:
>
>> On 11 Sep 2000, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
>>
>> > * Marc Schneiders wrote:
>> > >On 8 Sep 2000, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
>> > >> * Marc Schneiders wrote:
>> > >> > Maybe by introducing new gTLDs with the customary tax of $0.33 for
each
>> > >> > domain? (Did you know about that by the way? Not many seem to do.)
>> > >>
>> > >> I heard about such proposals but--as you can imagine--I was not able
to
>> > >> follow all news (and olds) while laying down at doctor's couch. So
I'm
>> > >> really proud of nearly dealing with all mail of the last weeks. If I
missed
>> > >> some questions, please mail me.
>> > >
>> > >This is not a proposal. This is an existing tax.
>> >
>> > No I found it, too.
>>
>> You mean "Yes,..." I assume.
>>
>> > >Did you not know where the Corporation you were running for, gets its
>> > >money from?
>> >
>> > No, did you expect me reading all documents available? You are wrong.
>>
>> I might have been wrong if I would have been expecting that. I did not.
>> I was amazed that you did not know about the ICANN tax on
>> domains. Especially since you were so vocal against new gTLDs, which
would
>> through the tax improve ICANNs financial position significantly.
>> So I do think, that you should have known about it, yes. Is that wrong?
>>
>> > I read the most important ones, those defining the cooperation. it's
history
>> > in short, and some critical dispute documents.
>>
>> Yes, maybe ICANN does not communicate about the tax it levies very
>> much... It has been in the press recently though, when a substantive
>> number of ccTLD registries refused to pay it...
>>
>> --
>> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>> % Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl %
>> %* marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org *%
>> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
>Regards,
>
>--
>Jeffrey A. Williams
>Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
>CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
>Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
>E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
>Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
>Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
>
>
>