[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Re: WIPO
- To: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Re: WIPO
- From: Alf Hansen <aha@uninett.no>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 00:45:24 +0200
- CC: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Organization: UNINETT FAS
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009172016140.27056-100000@s025.widexs.nl>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Marc Schneiders wrote:
...
>
> A trademark is a name under which you sell goods or services.
> A domain name is a name under which you can sell goods or services.
Yes, and you may protect a domain name as a Trade Mark.
>
> A trademark is just a name, be it one protected by law and registration.
> A domain name is just a name, be it one *not* protected by law, although
> registered.
As Thomas Hoeren stated:
> There is a chance to establish a new trademark using a
> domain name for business purposes.
Just using a DN for business purposes, may in some cases after a while
establish a new TM.
>
> Simple, right?
Right.
> --
> *-------------------------------------*
> Marc Schneiders (more in the header)
> *-------------------------------------*
Since this is very simple, why do we spend all this time discussing TMs
and DNs on the ICANN-europe-list?
Why are people so angry with WIPO and the URDP? UDRP is an offer and
both parties have to agree to use it. The law is allways a fallback.
Best regards,
--
Alf Hansen Mail address:
UNINETT FAS A/S
aha@uninett.no N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
Home page: Phone: +47 73 55 79 00
http://domen.uninett.no/~alf/ Fax: +47 73 55 79 01