[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ICANN-EU] Re: [ga] TLD feedback from a client
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: [ICANN-EU] Re: [ga] TLD feedback from a client
- From: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
- Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 00:19:40 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <826084330.20001003142459@userfriendly.com>
- References: <66.7f75e78.270b9c4a@aol.com><66.7f75e78.270b9c4a@aol.com>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
WXW, yeap. However the client may not have a good trademark
and have to register 1000ths of DNs a month like AMAZON. This
why the alt.TLD business is good business.
Jefsey
At 23:24 03/10/00, you wrote:
>Hello Attyross,
>Tuesday, October 03, 2000, 1:32:10 PM, you wrote:
> > FYI, this is some feedback from a client on proposed new TLDs.
> > ---------
> >> Incidently, I think ICANN has made a big error with the new extensions. It
> >> sets up a completely bad environment that is nothing short of
> extortion for
> >> the new domain providers. Every company needing to protect its existing
> >> domains now needs to pay someone for another domain JUST to prevent a
> >> squatter. It is the equivlent of permitting some agency to authorize a
>
>Sounds like your client has a misunderstanding of trademarks and
>domain names. He believes that in order to protect his trademark, he
>has to have every possible domain varient of it.
>
>He is mistaken.
>
>--
>Best regards,
> William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html