[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: [ICANN-EU] AMM's "government statement"



jdd wrote:
>
>for me I don't understand why the relevant internet name (tld) is not
>larger. why not allow 5 or 6 letters. I don't think technical problems are
>no more significatives; France is better than fr, deutchland better than
>de...


You are providing yourself the best argument: it is "deutschland", not 
"deutchland" ;>). The more complicated the string, the higher the chance to 
misspell it.

This said, we should make the difference between the already established 
ccTLDs (why change them?) and the to-be-established new TLDs.
I am not aware of any limitation on the size of the string of the latter: 
ICANN will not refuse a proposal on the basis of the length of the string 
only (but the fact that the majority of the proposed strings are short 
should tell us something).

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.