[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Things to Ask for at MDR
- To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Things to Ask for at MDR
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 22:25:38 -0800
- CC: icann-europe@fitug.de, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@medea.wz-berlin.de>, DOMAIN-POLICY <DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.NETSOL.COM>
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <20001108021853.B10194@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Thomas and all,
In your an Janet's proposal there are some really good points. Most
of which were made over two years ago to the than Interim ICANN
Board and were summarily dismissed by Mike Roberts.
I will outline below, the suggestions that were posted to the
comments@ICANN.org
about two years ago that are the same or very similar to what you and Jeanetts
proposal have.
Thomas Roessler
<roessler@does-not-exist.org>
At Large Members Forum
Requests for Bylaw Changes and Board Decisions/Practice
* Changing the Bylaws
The board should no longer be permitted to change the bylaws by
simple resolution. Require consent from (or at least give veto
right to) SOs and At Large Members / At Large Council.
This one of our original ideas that we submitted to the than ICANn Interim
board. I also think you mean here ALL of the At Large Members, don't you?
* Seating of Directors/Pending Decisions
Postpone controversial decisions until new directors are seated.
The current board's legitimacy to decide on such questions would
appear to be questionable.
Agreed. Our original proposal that is similar to this one would require
that if new board members are elected and a policy decision is pending
at the time of their setting that the ICANN membership (Read @Large)
must approve any and all MAJOR policy decisions by resolution and
majority vote.
* Expiration of Terms
Introduce equal treatment for elected At Large Directors and all
others. In particular, the elected At Large Directors should
continue to hold office until their successors are selected.
(Affects Art. V, S. 9 Bylaws.)
* Filling At Large Director Vacancies
New At Large Directors should be selected by existing At
Large Directors only. Rationale: There is no reason why
SO-selected directors should have a vote when filling At
Large seats. At Large Directors don't have a vote in filling
SO vacancies, either.
When some kind of representative At Large Council has been
established, it should have the right to fill At Large
Director vacancies. Note: This should remain the exception -
stick with direct elections for regular director selection!!
(Affects Art. V, S. 12 Bylaws.)
* . . .
At Large Members Forum
Requirements for the At Large Membership Study
* Examine member registration/activation process.
Agreed here as well!
Why did 50% of the registered members not activate their
membership?
We already know the answer to this question.
* How can a structured At Large Membership be funded?
* The study should call for input from the existing At Large
Members' community.
* The Advisory Committee on Membership (or its successor) should
be extended by at least one elected At Large Director and at
least one recognized individual from the At Large Members'
community.
Requirements for the Executive Search Committee
* Include at least one elected At Large Director in the Board's
Executive Search Committee.
It would seem even more reasonable that an EQUAL number of @large
directors should be on the Executive Search committee.
* Solicit input from the general Internet community on possible
candidates to serve as ICANN's CEO and President.
Also a good suggestion here as well!
Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Jeanette Hofmann and I had a lengthy talk about things the At Large
> Membership should ask for on the short and mid terms. We are
> planning to present this list at the At Large Members Forum at
> Marina Del Rey next week-end.
>
> A first draft can be found in the attachments. Please let us know
> your opinion on this, and tell us about any omissions or erros we
> have made.
>
> Thanks for your input,
> --
> Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
>
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208