[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ICANN-EU] Re: Groups Urge ICANN to Keep Promises



Jay and all,

  You don't think this letter from the DNRC is going to make
any difference to the current ICANN Board do you Jay?

Jay Fenello wrote:

> SOURCE:  The Domain Name Rights Coalition
>
> CONTACT:  Jay Fenello, Fenello.com, 678-585-9765
>
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>
> Public Interest Groups join with the DNRC in Urging ICANN To Keep
> Promises Given Since 1998 - Elect 9 At Large Directors, and Eliminate
> "Clean Sheet" Study Designed to Abolish At Large Representation
>
> HERNDON, VA, November 10, 2000 /PRNewswire/ -- The Domain Name
> Rights Coalition (DNRC), an organization dedicated to protecting the
> interests of entrepreneurs, small business owners and individuals in
> domain name issues, in conjunction with other Public Interest groups
> such as Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility as well as
> influential individuals in the area of Domain Names released a letter
> calling upon ICANN, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
> Numbers, to keep their word.
>
> In 1998, ICANN pledged to the Department of Commerce that it would
> never change the bylaws guaranteeing direct elections by the Internet
> rank-and-file of 9 electors, or half the Board.  "We commit that will
> never happen," wrote Esther Dyson, Chair of ICANN and one of the
> "Interim" unelected Board members, to the Commerce Department in 1998
> as part of ICANN's petition to become stewards of the Domain Name
> System (DNS). After receiving the contract to manage the DNS, however,
> ICANN reduced the number of At Large Directors from nine to five, and
> has announced it will re-examine whether to permit any Internet user
> representation after the terms of the newly elected directors expire.
>
> The letter calls upon ICANN to restore the representation promised to
> the Internet community since 1998, and renounce its threat to abolish
> At Large representation. "When ICANN was in serious trouble in 1998
> and 1999, they promised open elections for all" said Mikki Barry,
> President of the Domain Name Rights Coalition. "The Internet
> Community relied on their word."
>
> Barry cited Congressional Testimony of Esther Dyson at an oversight
> hearing before the House Commerce Committee in 1999, as well as
> letters to the Commerce Department and members of Congress, as
> evidence of ICANN's initial insistence it would provide Internet
> users the right to elect 9 directors. "But once Congress and
> Commerce seemed satisfied and NSI was brought into the fold,
> ICANN began a full reversal of their original stance."
>
> Barry and other critics warned Commerce in 1998, when it first
> considered ICANN's proposal, that nothing would stop ICANN from
> changing its bylaws to keep out the public once Commerce approved
> ICANN's applications. It was in response to this criticism that
> Dyson pledged on behalf of ICANN that no such changes would occur.
>
> Despite Dyson's pledge in 1998, and similar pledges in 1999, ICANN
> did change its bylaws, extending the terms of the initial directors,
> reducing the number of elected directors, and creating a "Clean
> Sheet" study to re-examine whether to allow Internet users any direct
> representation at all. When the limited elections ICANN permitted
> elected two of ICANN's vociferous critics, there was a widespread
> concern that ICANN might use the Clean Sheet study to eliminate At
> Large elections altogether, or reduce them further. ICANN's bylaws
> also have been changed to permit elected At Large directors only 2
> years service on the Board with automatic removal at term's end, but
> "constituency" directors receive 3 year terms and sit until further
> elections are called.
>
> "At the end of two years, the Board may well vote to eliminate At
> Large, and extend their own terms indefinitely." according to Barry.
> "Internet Users would have zero say in the very organization that
> determines their rights."
>
> Public interest groups warned ICANN that it would risk its legitimacy
> if it did not fulfill its promise of nine elected members from the
> At Large membership. The letter called upon the four remaining
> "Boardsquatters," the four unelected "Interim" Directors who have
> extended their terms three times, to resign. It also urged the Board
> to follow the recommendations of Professor Michael Froomkin and allow
> the five democratically elected directors from the At Large to fill
> the four vacancies until new At Large elections could fill them.
>
> Professor Froomkin's proposal is available at
> http://personal.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/boardsquat2.htm
> The DNRC letter can be seen at
> http://www.netpolicy.com/icann111000.html.
>
> The letter has already sparked a lively debate. Hans Klein, Chair
> of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR), cited
> the letter extensively in a panel discussion at the on-going ICANN
> meetings in Marina del Rey, where ICANN Board will soon decide how
> to proceed with the study. "The prospect of a clean-sheet study is
> a significant departure from ICANN's prior commitments," said Klein.
> "We fear that the so-called "clean slate" study may attempt to make
> a "clean sweep" of the At Large membership, ending democratic
> accountability in ICANN." CPSR is a signatory to the DNRC letter.
>
> The Domain Name Rights Coalition is an organization dedicated to
> ensuring the rights of individual and small business users of the
> Internet. Its website is located at http://www.domainnamerights.org.
>
> The Domain Name Rights Coalition was formed in 1996, and has worked
> for national and international policies which are fair and equitable
> to all users of the Internet ever since. It has also worked to protect
> the Internet as a global medium of communication and free speech, and
> it is well known for its vigilant fight against the Domain Name Dispute
> Policy of Network Solutions, Inc. and similar policies recommended by
> the World Intellectual Property Organization and later implemented by
> ICANN.
>
> ###
> +++
>
> Jay Fenello,
> New Media Strategies
> ------------------------------------
> http://www.fenello.com  678-585-9765
> Aligning with Purpose(sm) ... for a Better World
> ----------------------------------------------------
> "Wake up, Neo...  The Matrix has you..."  -- Trinity

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208