Re: [icann-eu] Does the ICANN legally exist (this is not a joke)?

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Jeff,
I certainly agree with you about informing your destinees of this
interesting thread. I would have preferred you do it in sending my
initial post (but may be you did? then I would apologize) rather
than a presentation making me to support the very ideas I fight.

I had then to inform the destinees of the true nature of my thinking,
since obviously Peter de Blanc (and probably the others) had been
misinformed by Alexander's reading.

The Californian law gives the interesting opportunity to use the
GA as an *additional* instance, with powers and duties in areas
of cc/gTLDs concerns and usual limitations otherwise.

Proposing to cleverly use that possibility purportedly prepared
(yet overlooked) by the "Membership analysis" discussion is by
no means "handing the ICANN to the ccTLDs" !!!

It is the *absolute* contrary! It is making an internal cooperation
attractive enough to ccTLDs for them to fully cooperate and develop
the ICANN as the stakeholders' "common house".

Jefsey


At 21:26 08/12/00, Jeff Williams wrote:
>Jefsey and all,
>
>You Jefsey, are free to disagree with whomever and whatever you like,
>as are others, of course.  I for one, do not see where I caused any confusion
>of any kind.  Rather, I believe that I was simply more broadly informing
>others of this threads discussion points that were good ones that needed
>airing out a little.

<snip>


>Regards,
>
>--
>Jeffrey A. Williams
>Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
>CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
>Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
>E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
>Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
>Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208