[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [icann-europe] Recommended Reading: Brad Templeton on ICANN andthe DNS
- To: Griffini Giorgio <grunz@tin.it>
- Subject: Re: [icann-europe] Recommended Reading: Brad Templeton on ICANN andthe DNS
- From: Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 02:38:12 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>, icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: icann-europe@angua.rince.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: moderator for icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <20010717002636.UMYW22440.fep41-svc.tin.it@xc2>
- List-Help: <mailto:icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <icann-europe.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:icann-europe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, at 02:26 [=GMT+0200], Griffini Giorgio wrote:
> Marc Schneiders wrote:
> > It does not make sense to put a long number on a car, or advertize it
> > on the radio (unless it is 1111111111). People will not remember it,
> > when they get to their office.
> >
>
> It depends on available tools... If people do not have safe means to find the
> counterpart other than that 'long' number you are absolutely right... If one can
> resort to a safe directory (which is not available or possibly incomplete
> (contribution driven search engines) with the current DNS) things becames a
> lot easier and consistent. Just to talk about imagine that when registering a
> domain one get a hierarchical unique opaque identifier (technically
> corresponding to what actually is the 'name') and then is allowed to give
> under his own responsability 4 to 8 (we say) 'attributes' to put into the
> 'directory' entry rwhich must exist and is reserved for his domain.in order of
> what the registrant thinks to be more important to him for being found /
> identified / searched for.
> When a user want to contact him use: a) direct opaque identifier as shown
> on business card, email, ad... b) search the directory by keyword which
> likely identify the registrant (trade marks , company name, product name,
> family name) c) resort to a local directory entry where the opaque identifier
> has been collected by method a,b
I am not sure I get it. In any case, I do not understand what I can
put on my trucks with your system in stead of, say, www.kizz.com or
www.bargainbook.com.
--
Marc@Schneiders.ORG
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de