FITUG e.V.Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft |
![]() |
------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 18:13:25 GMT0BST From: "Yaman Akdeniz" <lawya@lucs-01.novell.leeds.ac.uk> Subject: Sunday Times on the Intel issue To: gilc-plan@privacy.org Reply-to: gilc-plan@gilc.org Civil-rights leaders fear Intel's new chip will end privacy on the Internet, writes Sean Hargrave. Big Brother chip faces boycotts, The Sunday Times, 31 January, 1999 INTEL is attempting to avoid an embarrassing boycott that could hamper the launch of its new range of Pentium chips at the end of February. The company wants to assure civil-rights campaigners that privacy on the Internet will not be compromised by a security feature inside the new Pentium III chip that broadcasts a processor's serial number over the Net. Civil-rights organisations are hostile to the device because they claim it infringes every Net user's right to browse anonymously. In Arizona a Republican senator, Steve May, has gone so far as to draft a bill to ban the chip from being sold in the state. British and American campaigners have already called for a boycott of the Pentium III and are launching a campaign against the company entitled "Big Brother Inside" - a play on the chipmaker's "Intel Inside" logo. A web site www.bigbrotherinside.com will be launched this week with a parody of the company's logo. In the face of such strong criticism Intel has already partly backed down over the chip's security feature. Last week it announced Pentium III PCs would come loaded with software allowing owners to disable it. However, the company admits the chips will still reach customers with the security feature switched on, leaving the onus on the owner to switch it off. It also admits that the software to turn it off will not be included in the first batches of machines, though it can be downloaded from Intel's web site. British activists, like their American counterparts, claim this action is too little, too late. Simon Davies, a campaigner with Privacy International in London, labels the new chip "the tool of a dictator". He is urging British consumers to boycott the Pentium III to deter companies from producing equipment that could be used to compromise Net privacy. "This new chip is just part of a trend away from privacy on the Net that has to be combated," he says. "We believe the Net should be a place where people can browse without sites knowing their identity. "It's not just this chip we're worried about. It's the principle and the possibility of misuse. It's all right for Intel, a huge American firm, to say privacy isn't affected. They live in a democracy where human rights are respected. We're especially concerned to establish a private, free Internet for people in countries such as China and Thailand and technology like this could be misused to track Net users." Intel claims the campaigners are mistaken. It says the new facility can only identify a computer. It cannot allow the online habits of a user to be tracked. "It is there to give more security to people online," says Andrew Thomas of Intel. "An ideal use would be for credit-card companies and banks to identify a customer. They would know the serial numbers of the computers a person uses and not accept transactions from other terminals. It would mean somebody who steals your credit card would not be able to go online and buy through another computer." Yaman Akdeniz, a leading British Net lawyer and civil-rights campaigner, will meet Intel representatives on Wednesday to discuss what Intel would have to do to put an end to calls for the Pentium III to be boycotted in Britain. "I can't really see the company changing its plans at this late stage," he says. "If that is the case, the best thing they could do is at least supply the chips with the default set to off, so people would have to turn it on if they want it." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yaman Akdeniz <lawya@leeds.ac.uk> Cyber-Rights & Cyber-Liberties (UK) at: http://www.cyber-rights.org Read the new CR&CL (UK) Report, Who Watches the Watchmen, Part:II Accountability & Effective Self-Regulation in the Information Age, August 1998 at http://www.cyber-rights.org/watchmen-ii.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Zurück