FITUG e.V.Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft |
![]() |
------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 22:24:14 -0500 To: politech@vorlon.mit.edu From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> Subject: FC: Louis Freeh: "I have not given up on encryption" Reply-to: declan@well.com On February 4, FBI Director Louis Freeh testified before the Senate Appropriations subcommittee chaired by Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH). Since the topic was counterterrorism, the discussion naturally turned to encryption. You may remember the FBI in September 1997 persuaded one House committee to make it a federal crime to manufacture, sell, or import unapproved encryption devices (including hardware and software). That bill never made it to the House floor. -Declan ******** SEN. GREGG: Have you given up on encryption? MR. FREEH: I have not given up on encryption. SEN. GREGG: I thought you might have. MR. FREEH: And I am pleased to report that both the attorney general and I have had very good discussions with leaders of the industry. We have reached some agreements on the support of a technical center. In fact, the legislation that was passed in October gives us the authority to receive their offer of services and personnel to solve some of these problems on a case-by-case basis, if not on a global basis. And we're very optimistic about that. We also believe, however, that we need to come back to the Congress for authority and certainly for support in implementing a program where we have non-mandatory controls but incentives which will give our industry the impetus to continue to support what we want to establish. ******* This is from Freeh's prepared statement: Terrorists, both abroad and at home, are using technology to protect their operations from being discovered and thwart the efforts of law enforcement to detect, prevent, and investigate such acts. Convicted spy Aldrich Ames was told by his Russian handlers to encrypt his computer files. International drug traffickers also are using encryption to avoid detection by law enforcement. Most encryption products manufactured today for use by the general public are non-recoverable. This means they do not include features that provide for timely law enforcement access to the plain text of encrypted communications and computer files that are lawfully seized. Law enforcement remains in unanimous agreement that the continued widespread availability and increasing use of strong, non-recoverable encryption products will soon nullify our effective use of court authorized electronic surveillance and the execution of lawful search and seizure warrants. The loss of these capabilities will devastate our capabilities for fighting crime, preventing acts of terrorism, and protecting the national security. Recently, discussions with industry have indicated a willingness to work with law enforcement in meeting our concerns and assisting in developing a law enforcement counterencryption capability. I strongly urge the Congress to adopt a balanced public policy on encryption, one that carefully balances the legitimate needs of law enforcement to protect our Nation's citizens and preserve the national security with the needs of individuals. The demand for accessing, examining, and analyzing computers and computer storage media for evidentiary purposes is becoming increasingly critical to our ability to investigate terrorism, child pornography, computer-facilitated crimes, and other cases. In the past, the Subcommittee has supported FBI efforts to establish a data forensics capability through our Computer Analysis Response Teams. There is a need to further expand this capability to address a growing workload. Indeed, our limited capability has created a backlog that impacts on both investigations and prosecutions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology To subscribe: send a message to majordomo@vorlon.mit.edu with this text: subscribe politech More information is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----Zurück