FITUG e.V.Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft |
![]() |
------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 11:57:44 -0500 To: cryptography@c2.net From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com> Subject: US Crypto 5 + AU We offer five recent statements on US crypto policy by the House Armed Services Committee, Senator Burns, AG Reno, FBI's Freeh and John Gilmore: http://jya.com/us-crypto5.htm We'd appreciate pointers to other statements and reactions to the five. Senator Burns' office says a draft of a crypto bill is being worked on but will not be much different from his 97 version. Senator Goodlatte is said to be working on one too. ACP, BSA and perhaps others are noodling the topic while waiting the end of the circus. Meanwhile the administration is not budging from its KE policy, at home and abroad. And the Wassenaar herd? Who knows. AU may be getting ready to bolt writes Roger Clarke today on AU Crypto: [Begin forward] Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 16:10:19 +1100 Steve Orlowski suggested in an APSCF (Smart Cards Forum) meeting on Monday 8 Feb that the Australian Government had recently adapted its policy to "facilitate the use of and access to strong cryptography" (I wrote that down as he said it, and was shocked, so I remember it). Steve referred to the NOIE 'Strategic Framework for the Info Economy' document; but the actual statement in there is quite different: "The confidence of Australian businesses and other users in the security and authenticity of their online transactions and activity can be increased by governments facilitating the use of and access to authentication and encryption technology and systems. The government recognises the broad benefits that will flow from sound business practice in this type of technology, and proposes to establish itself as an example of good practice". http://www.noie.gov.au/docs/strategy/strategicframework.html (2.5, p.20: Security and Authentication) So it's just a statement that 'we've heard, and understand, that the private sector wants access to strong crypto'. I distribute this because I fear that Steve may repeat that inaccuracy, and cause unnecessary confusion: sorry, but as far as I can see, nothing's changed ... It's quite feasible, on the other hand, to read the inaccuracy as a signal that the Australian Government either expects the U.S. Government to soon wake up to itself, enabling a change to the Australian Government's policy; or even that the Australian Government is losing patience, and may choose the right time to lead the U.S. Government in the appropriate direction. Roger Clarke http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/ Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd, 78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA Tel: +61 2 6288 1472, and 6288 6916 mailto:Roger.Clarke@xamax.com.au http://www.xamax.com.au/ Visiting Fellow, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA Information Sciences Building Room 211 Tel: +61 2 6249 3666 [End forward]Zurück