FITUG e.V.Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft |
![]() |
------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:18:11 -0400 From: Cyberspace Policy Institute <cpi@SEAS.GWU.EDU> To: firewalls@lists.gnac.net, risks@csl.sri.com, cryptography@c2.net Subject: Growing Development of Foreign Encryption Products in the Face of U.S. Export Regulations You may be interested in a report released June 10, 1999, entitled "Growing Development of Foreign Encryption Products in the Face of U. S. Export Regulations" by the Cyberspace Policy Institute of The George Washington University. The full report is at http://www.seas.gwu.edu/seas/institutes/cpi/library/docs/cpi-1999-02.p df The executive summary follows: GROWING DEVELOPMENT OF FOREIGN ENCRYPTION PRODUCTS IN THE FACE OF U.S. EXPORT REGULATIONS Lance J. Hoffman* David M. Balenson** Karen A. Metivier-Carreiro* Anya Kim* Matthew G. Mundy** June 10, 1999 Report No. GWU-CPI-1999-02 http://www.seas.gwu.edu/seas/institutes/cpi/library/docs/cpi-1999-02.p df *Cyberspace Policy Institute, School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC **NAI Labs, The Security Research Division of Network Associates, Inc., Glenwood, MD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Development of cryptographic products outside the United States is not only continuing but is expanding to additional countries; with rapid growth of the Internet, communications-related cryptography especially is experiencing high growth, especially in electronic mail, virtual private network, and IPsec products. This report surveys encryption products developed outside the United States and provides some information on the effect of the United States export control regime on American and foreign manufacturers. We have identified 805 hardware and/or software products incorporating cryptography manufactured in 35 countries outside the United States. The most foreign cryptographic products are manufactured in the United Kingdom, followed by Germany, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Israel in that order. Other countries accounted for slightly more than a quarter of the world's total of encryption products. A full summary listing of the foreign cryptographic products can be found in an appendix to the report. The 805 foreign cryptographic products represent a 149-product increase (22%) over the most recent previous survey in December 1997. A majority of the new foreign cryptographic products are software rather than hardware. Also, a majority of these new products are communications-oriented rather than data storage oriented; they heavily tend towards secure electronic mail, IP security (IPsec), and Virtual Private Network applications. We identified at least 167 foreign cryptographic products that use strong encryption in the form of these algorithms: Triple DES, IDEA, BLOWFISH, RC5, or CAST-128. Despite the increasing use of these stronger alternatives to DES, there also continues to be a large number of foreign products offering the use of DES, though we expect to see a decrease in coming years. New cryptography product manufacturers have appeared in six new countries since December 1997, and there has been a large increase in the number of products produced by certain countries. The new countries are Estonia, Iceland, Isle of Man, Romania, South Korea, and Turkey. The United Kingdom jumped by 20 products from 119 to 139, and Germany jumped from 76 products to 104. Also notable was Japan's increase, from six products to 18, and Mexico's, from a single product to six at the present time. We identified a total of 512 foreign companies that either manufacture or distribute foreign cryptographic products in at least 67 countries outside the United States. A full summary listing of these is given in an appendix to the report. On average, the quality of foreign and U. S. products is comparable. There are a number of very good foreign encryption products that are quite competitive in strength, standards compliance, and functionality. We present sketches of some representative competitors to U.S. manufacturers of software and hardware with encryption capabilities; all are developing products with strong encryption and have as customers a number of large foreign or multinational corporations. The specific companies highlighted are Baltimore Technologies, Brokat, Check Point, Data Fellows, Entrust, Radguard, Seguridata Privada, Sophos, and Utimaco. We found some examples of advertising used by non-U. S. companies that generally attempted to create a perception that purchasing American products may involve significant red tape and the encryption may not be strong due to export controls. This almost always appeared on Web sites. We observed that companies vie to have encryption products that meet certain accepted worldwide standards. Encryption experts from all over the world have contributed to two important international standards efforts, IPsec and the Advanced Encryption Standard.. Finally, we suggested that our empirical product data could be combined with economic measures and economic theories to better explain why we are seeing the observed growth and to examine the effects of Internet growth, e-commerce development, and regulatory actions on the international cryptographic market over time, thus getting better insights into the implications of various policy options.Zurück