FITUG e.V.Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft |
![]() |
------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 08:08:21 -0500 To: politech@vorlon.mit.edu From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> Subject: FC: Response to the Maginot Line of Encryption Falls Reply-to: declan@well.com
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 00:08:03 -0500 To: declan@well.com From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg@epic.org Subject: Re: FC: The Maginot Line of Encryption Falls It is worth noting that the change in French crypto policy came about in large measure because of pressure from EU officials in Brussels. The French policy stood as a significant barrier to the promotion of electronic commerce within the European Union. Germany,in particular, had made clear its view that the French policy on encryption was simply incompatible with the requirements of an integrated European economy. Interestingly, the US had tried to leverage the French TTP law to establish support among other European countries for key escrow/key recovery. But apart from the long-time intelligence allies in the UK, there were no takers. In 1996-97, Stewart Baker was one of those who thought it might still be possible for a US-UK-French collaboration to force a key recovery solution. But thankfully that failed, and even the recently revised Wassenaar rules seem unlikely to have any significant impact on the development of crypto in Europe. Marc Rotenberg EPIC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology To subscribe: send a message to majordomo@vorlon.mit.edu with this text: subscribe politech More information is at Zurück