FITUG e.V.
Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft
FITUG e.V.Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft |
|
------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 15:56:03 -0500 To: politech@vorlon.mit.edu From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> Subject: FC: Yes, British Telecom *does* want to segregate Web sites Copies to: john.c.lewis@bt.com Send reply to: declan@well.com
**********
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 12:53:20 -0500 From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> To: declan@well.com Subject: Re: FC: British Telecom says idea "distorted," wants other suggestions
Declan:
Your take on Lewis's policy perspective was exactly correct. I have been interacting with Lewis and another BT representative on ICANN's Working Group C on new TLDs for several months. The BT representatives have consistently advocated a highly regulated DNS name space. For example, instead of allowing new businesses and organizations to propose their own new TLD names, BT wants ICANN to establish a central, fixed classification scheme for new TLDs. Each TLD would have a very specific "charter" as to who could and could not register within it.
As Lewis put it, "the TLD structure should embody a framework which precludes replication of domain types, interest groups or business areas, to avoid confusing Internet customers."
This has profound implications for the regulation of the Net as a whole. Your discussion of how pornography might be classified did the community a service by highlighting one of the dangers of such an apporach. But it is only one aspect of what could turn out to be a way to exert sweeping forms of leverage over Internet content. Imagine how robust the publication market would be if some international authority decided that there should be a "framework which precludes replication of [magazine content] types, interest groups, or business areas, to avoid confusing [magazine] customers." Imagine the regulation that would be imposed as a relatively unaccountable international regulatory agency (ICANN) decided which form of publication content belongs in which category.
Those of you who have not been struggling in the trenches of ICANN's working groups for the past 8 months probably cannot believe how rigid and regulatory are the attitudes of the business and political interests who have gravitated to ICANN's DNSO.
Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Is BT justifiably annoyed or simply backpedaling from a proposal > accidentally sent to a public list? You decide: > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc00/msg00090.html >
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology To subscribe: send a message to majordomo@vorlon.mit.edu with this text: subscribe politech More information is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ------- End of forwarded message -------