FITUG e.V.Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft |
![]() |
------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 11:23:36 +0100 To: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk From: Donald ramsbottom <donald@ramsbottom.co.uk> Subject: Business on Straw Send reply to: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk
>From CW360:
http://www.cw360asp.com/eb/eb.asp?b=303&a=106429&f=1&i=256108
> Business groups deny Straw's accusation > by Bruce Ackland > Tuesday 2 October 2001 > > Business organisations have reacted with anger and > concern to Foreign Secretary Jack Straw's claim > that opponentsof the
> Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA)undermined the
> fight against terrorism. > > Straw last week branded opponents of Internet > surveillance legislation as "naïve" and claimed > that the changes toRIPA they
> had forced on the government weakened its ability > tointercept
> communications from terrorists. > > The e.centre, an e-business trade group, was > particularly angered by the former home > secretary's statement > > E.centre's managing director Alan Boxer said: "Who > does Mr Straw think has been naïve in this regard? > I certainlydo not
> accept that e.centre and our 16,000 corporate > membersfrom all
> industrial sectors deserve to be accused. > > "The e.centre has always supported the > government'spolicy in
> trying to establish an interception regime to > policethreats to the
> economic well-being of the UK. But when governmentrequires
> communication service providers to set up systems > whichare
> technically not feasible, it is only right thatindustry points out the
> unworkable nature of such a strategy," he added. > > The Institute of Directors (IoD) said tactics used > infighting the
> RIP Act would have to be reconsidered following > theattacks on
> the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon. > > Richard Barron, policy unit director of the IoD, > said:"The events
> of 11 September have put a different complexion on > thedebate.
> It changes the whole nature of the argument. There > willbe more
> data interception and therefore more burdens on > companies. > > "I would hope against a knee-jerk reaction from > thegovernment,
> but we totally understand the need for heightenedanti-terror
> legislation. I just hope the government can be > clearabout what
> they plan to do." > > Pamela Taylor, senior e-business policy adviser at > the Confederation of British Industry, added: "We > are asconcerned
> about terrorism as the government, but we would > urgecaution
> when it comes to increased data interception. Theevents in the
> US demonstrated that business is a key target forterrorists and
> we hope that in response to this the government > willcontinue to
> seek a balance between new anti-terror legislation > and business interests
Donald Ramsbottom BA LLb (Hons) PGdip Ramsbottom & Co Solicitors Internet and Global Encryption Law Specialists & General UK Law Matters 5 Seagrove Avenue Hayling Island Hampshire UK Tel (44) 023 9246 5931 Fax (44) 023 9246 8349 Regulated by the Law Society in the conduct of Investment business Service by Fax or Email NOT accepted
------- End of forwarded message -------