FITUG e.V.Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft |
![]() |
http://eon.law.harvard.edu/~wseltzer/napster.html
Case Name: A&M RECORDS V NAPSTER Case Number: 00-16401
Date Filed: 02/12/01
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
A&M RECORDS, INC., a corporation; GEFFEN RECORDS, INC., a corporation; INTERSCOPE RECORDS; SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MCA RECORDS, INC.; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORP.; ISLAND RECORDS, INC.; MOTOWN RECORD CO.; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
NAPSTER, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
[...]
We direct that the preliminary injunction fashioned by the district court prior to this appeal shall remain stayed until it is modified by the district court to conform to the requirements of this opinion. We order a partial remand of this case on the date of the filing of this opinion for the limited purpose of permitting the district court to proceed with the settlement and entry of the modified preliminary injunction.
[...]
See also
http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/02/12/napster.decision/index.html