FITUG e.V.
Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft
FITUG e.V.Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft |
|
------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:59:52 -0500 To: politech@politechbot.com From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> Subject: FC: Pentagon wants a "Big Brother" supercomputer, from NYT Send reply to: declan@well.com
Previous Politech message:
"U.S. creates (another) surveillance office run by J. Poindexter" http://www.politechbot.com/p-03153.html
---
From: "Danny Yavuzkurt" <ayavuzk@fas.harvard.edu> To: <declan@well.com> Subject: Pentagon desires 'Big Brother' supercomputer Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:12:05 -0500
Don't know if you've seen this article already, Declan (I assume you have, it's a couple of days old), but everyone on Slashdot was talking (http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/11/09/2242250) about this article at the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/politics/09COMP.html) that makes CopNet look like an Atari 2600. Who's involved? Are you not surprised to find out it's Vice Admiral John Poindexter, of Iran-Contra infamy (he was Reagan's National Security Director, and would've been convicted of felonies, if it hadn't been for Reagan's protection..). Now, combine that with, oh my god, he's the director of the IAO (http://www.darpa.mil/iao/, have you ever seen a more disturbing logo - or mission statement?).. and you can see why we're worried.
According to the article, the IAO is responsible - no surprise - for "developing new surveillance technologies in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks," and the supercomputer idea is reportedly being mulled over by Rumsfeld, who was seen having lunch with Poindexter. It's all hush-hush, the administration won't comment on it, and civil liberties advocates aren't the only ones worried - hell, even the panel the Pentagon hired to review it is having second thoughts. Here's a direct paragraph from the article: ----- "A lot of my colleagues are uncomfortable about this and worry about the potential uses that this technology might be put, if not by this administration then by a future one," said Barbara Simon, a computer scientist who is past president of the Association of Computing Machinery. "Once you've got it in place you can't control it." -----
Looks like the people who know the technology, at least, have their heads on straight about this. Too bad the government pinheads and Poindexters think technology can solve all our security problems - and that we should go ahead and line up to be strip-searched of our rights to 'prevent terrorism'. So, data mining of all Americans' credit card data, cross-referenced with traffic violations, Usenet posts, and medical records, will suppsedly detect terrorists? It doesn't take a genius to see that this system will be far more useful for creating 'enemies lists' Nixon would have killed for, suppressing internal dissent, harrassing law-abiding citizens, and, eventually, turning this country into the police state the Pentagon - and, apparently, the Bush administration - wants.
Danny
---
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 09:35:58 -0600 To: declan@well.com From: Scott Schram <scott@schram.net> Subject: NYTimes: Pentagon Plans "Total Information Awareness"
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/politics/09COMP.html
(Registration required.)
Pentagon Plans a Computer System That Would Peek at Personal Data of Americans By JOHN MARKOFF
The Pentagon is constructing a computer system that could create a vast electronic dragnet, searching for personal information as part of the hunt for terrorists around the globe — including the United States.
As the director of the effort, Vice Adm. John M. Poindexter, has described the system in Pentagon documents and in speeches, it will provide intelligence analysts and law enforcement officials with instant access to information from Internet mail and calling records to credit card and banking transactions and travel documents, without a search warrant.
<snip>
---
To: "Declan@Well. Com" <declan@well.com> Subject: FW: Poindexter et al (was Surveillance ...) Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 12:50:55 -0800
Declan,
I posted this reply to an e-mail list that I'm on. You've probably seen the NYT lead in article at this point, and are much more aware of the political background. Personally, I'm dismayed by how many retreaded apparatchiks with what I'd view as unsavory backgorounds are being re-instated within the current government and administration.
(no attribution thanks)
XXXX wrote: That the issue is being reported by the NYT suggests the system already exists and may have existed for many years. Now it's just a matter of the extent to which it will be used by those with the authority to use it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/politics/09COMP.html?ex=1037509200&e n=873ff5626a3c666e&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------------
Excerpt: As the director of the effort, Vice Adm. John M. Poindexter, has described the system in Pentagon documents and in speeches, it will provide intelligence analysts and law enforcement officials with instant access to information from Internet mail and calling records to credit card and banking transactions and travel documents, without a search warrant.
Historically, military and intelligence agencies have not been permitted to spy on Americans without extraordinary legal authorization. But Admiral Poindexter, the former national security adviser in the Reagan administration, has argued that the government needs broad new powers to process, store and mine billions of minute details of electronic life in the United States.
Admiral Poindexter, who has described the plan in public documents and speeches but declined to be interviewed, has said that the government needs to "break down the stovepipes" that separate commercial and government databases, allowing teams of intelligence agency analysts to hunt for hidden patterns of activity with powerful computers.
"We must become much more efficient and more clever in the ways we find new sources of data, mine information from the new and old, generate information, make it available for analysis, convert it to knowledge, and create actionable options," he said in a speech in California earlier this year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------------
Doesn't that name Poindexter sound familiar?
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB2/nsaebb2.htm
Manuel Noriega In June, 1986, the New York Times published articles detailing years of Panamanian leader Manuel Noriega's collaboration with Colombian drug traffickers. Reporter Seymour Hersh wrote that Noriega "is extensively involved in illicit money laundering and drug activities," and that an unnamed White House official "said the most significant drug running in Panama was being directed by General Noriega." In August, Noriega, a long-standing U.S. intelligence asset, sent an emissary to Washington to seek assistance from the Reagan administration in rehabilitating his drug-stained reputation. Oliver North, who met with Noriega's representative, described the meeting in an August 23, 1986 e-mail message to Reagan national security advisor John Poindexter. "You will recall that over the years Manuel Noriega in Panama and I have developed a fairly good relationship," North writes before explaining Noriega's proposal. If U.S. officials can "help clean up his image" and lift the ban on arms sales to the Panamanian Defense Force, Noriega will "'take care of' the Sandinista leadership for us."
North tells Poindexter that Noriega can assist with sabotage against the Sandinistas, and suggests paying Noriega a million dollars -- from "Project Democracy" funds raised from the sale of U.S. arms to Iran -- for the Panamanian leader's help in destroying Nicaraguan economic installations.
The same day Poindexter responds with an e-mail message authorizing North to meet secretly with Noriega. "I have nothing against him other than his illegal activities," Poindexter writes.
On the following day, August 24, North's notebook records a meeting with CIA official Duane "Dewey" Clarridge on Noriega's overture. They decided, according to this entry, to "send word back to Noriega to meet in Europe or Israel."
The CIA's Alan Fiers later recalls North's involvement with the Noriega sabotage proposal. In testimony at the 1992 trial of former CIA official Clair George, Fiers describes North's plan as it was discussed at a meeting of the Reagan administration's Restricted Interagency Group: "[North] made a very strong suggestion that . . . there needed to be a resistance presence in the western part of Nicaragua, where the resistance did not operate. And he said, 'I can arrange to have General Noriega execute some insurgent -- some operations there -- sabotage operations in that area. It will cost us about $1 million. Do we want to do it?' And there was significant silence at the table. And then I recall I said, 'No. We don't want to do that.'"
Senior officials ignored Fiers' opinion. On September 20, North informed Poindexter via e-mail that "Noriega wants to meet me in London" and that both Elliott Abrams and Secretary of State George Shultz support the initiative. Two days later, Poindexter authorized the North/Noriega meeting.
North's notebook lists details of his meeting with Noriega, which took place in a London hotel on September 22. According to the notes, the two discussed developing a commando training program in Panama, with Israeli support, for the contras and Afghani rebels. They also spoke of sabotaging major economic targets in the Managua area, including an airport, an oil refinery, and electric and telephone systems. (These plans were apparently aborted when the Iran-Contra scandal broke in November 1986.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------------
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/DOCUMENT/940411.htm
[...] There's something about the White House electronic mail that seems to bring out the worst tendencies among government officials, whoever's in the White House:
Oliver North and national security adviser John Poindexter electronically shredded thousands of their E-mail messages on their way out of the NSC in November 1986 (but the system's back-up tapes allowed investigators to recover these messages and use them as legal evidence). The Reagan Administration, with the acquiescence of the National Archives, planned to blip out all the E-mail memory and backup tapes on its way out of office in January 1989, only to be stopped by our lawsuit. After we won court rulings establishing that the records laws apply to e-mail, the Bush Administration staged a midnight ride on Inauguration Eve 1993 to round up the computer tapes and put them beyond the law, under a secret agreement which purported to give Mr. Bush control of the tapes, contrary to the post-Watergate Presidential Records Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------------
Back in 1996, a Mercury News reporter, Webb, published a series titled "Dark Alliance" which drew links between the surge in crack cocaine usage in LA's black neighborhoods (which remains a big probelem today) with the possible CIA link to the Contras. The author subsequently wrote a book of teh same name, and most of the original article seems to be printed here:
http://home.attbi.com/~gary.webb/wsb/html/view.cgi-home.html-.html
Here's a review of the media over-reaction against the article (it has links to some related reading):
http://www.parascope.com/articles/1196/media.htm
And another "Dark Alliance" page:
http://www.lycaeum.org/drugwar/DARKALLIANCE/
---
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:00:01 -0800 From: "Da'ud X Mohammed" <webmaster@ocnsignal.com> Reply-To: webmaster@ocnsignal.com Organization: Oregon Coast News Signal
Hullo Declan,
Two stories:
1. Besides what Poindexter is back to do...
2. He's back!
First the two e-mails you sent, then the following.
Is there a trend here??
Thanks.
With peace
dxm
**********
source: http://cryptome.org/tia-queeg.htm
The New York Times, November 9, 2002
INTELLIGENCE
Pentagon Plans a Computer System That Would Peek at Personal Data of Americans
By JOHN MARKOFF
The Pentagon is constructing a computer system that could create a vast electronic dragnet, searching for personal information as part of the hunt for terrorists around the globe -- including the United States. As the director of the effort, Vice Adm. John M. Poindexter, has described the system in Pentagon documents and in speeches, it will provide intelligence analysts and law enforcement officials with instant access to information from Internet mail and calling records to credit card and banking transactions and travel documents, without a search warrant.
[SNIP]
Declan McCullagh wrote:
>--- >Subject: Prisoners of K Street >Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:36:54 -0500 >From: "James V. Delong" <JDeLong@cei.org> >To: "Declan McCullagh (E-mail)" <declan@well.com> > Declan - >Re your piece this morning. >Best, >Jim > http://www.cei.org/utils/printer.cfm?AID=1923 >--- > Prisoners of K Street > UpDates > by James V. DeLong > November 1, 2000 > From the October/November issue of CEI > UpDate > Recently I was talking with Roger Cochetti, VP of Network > Solutions and experienced observer of the high tech scene. "The > Internet is at a fork," he said. "Over the next couple of years > it could be confirmed in its existence as a free-market, > free-wheeling, chaotic, fount of imaginative innovation and > multiplying value. Or it could go down the road taken by > broadcasting and telephone, becoming regulated, stodgy, hostile > to technical progress, and lawyer-driven."
[SNIP]
Declan McCullagh wrote:
> > http://news.com.com/2010-1071-965160.html > > Perspective: Don't get mad, get even > By Declan McCullagh > November 11, 2002, 4:00 AM PT > > WASHINGTON -- The National Rifle Association rates politicians on > whether they support the Second Amendment. > > Emily's List gives campaign cash to pro-choice Democratic women. The > Club for Growth supports politicos who pledge to lower taxes and limit > government, while aiming to defeat tax-and-spenders. > > Is it time for the technology industry to come up with a similar way > to reward friends and punish enemies?
[SNIP]
---
From: "alex kananaskis" To: declan@well.com Cc: politech@politechbot.com Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 03:19:02 -0500 Subject: 'total information awareness' from darpa
hi declan,
[please hide my address] hope you've seen this from the nytimes, about what vice adm. poindexter's orwellian-sounding 'office of information awareness' is up to behind the scenes at darpa. a plan is afoot to implement a system for mining and monitoring vast quantities of electronic data- way past echelon, and similar to rissnet in terms of cross-referencing ability- about people around the world, including in the usa. as the piece notes, this would require dismembering the enshrined privacy act of 1974.
epic's marc rotenberg: "The vehicle is the Homeland Security Act, the technology is Darpa and the agency is the F.B.I. The outcome is a system of national surveillance of the American public."
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/politics/09COMP.html?ex=1037854354&e i=1&en=2c953778a582ee6b
ever vigilant, alex
ps- how do you libertarians respond when people like acm's barbara simon warn "Once you've got it in place you can't control it"? the state does enforce its monopoly after all...
---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice. To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/ Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?qÞclan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
------- End of forwarded message -------