[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] DNSO-GA arguments belong elsewhere!
- To: eric@hi-tek.com
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] DNSO-GA arguments belong elsewhere!
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 16:28:28 -0700
- CC: Bruce Young <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>, At-Large Discussion List <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <GMEHJOBGDHBJAFJNENBNAEFFCFAA.Bruce@barelyadequate.info> <3CFA53F1.72263C6D@hi-tek.com>
Eric and all stakeholders or interested parties,
eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
> May we hold a few truths to be self evident?
>
> The Internet must be not restricted yet governed. Not by fiat or
> proclamation. But by the will of the users.
I would add: "and only by the stakeholders/users"...
>
>
> Any matter that interferes with Access, Reliability and Stability is to be
> avoided.
I would add: "or as otherwise specified for specific penelities can be
inforced and/or otherwise imposed" than list those specific instances...
Bla bla bla, ect. ect, Example, example... and so forth
>
>
> Innovation and alternative solutions are to be supported and incorporated into
> the community of the Internet.
Good sugestion here..
>
>
> There are problems so we must embrace solutions.
>
> There is a community of Internet users and we are responsible to one another.
>
> As members of the users of the Internet we must endeavour to act in the
> interests of other users.
>
> Perhaps not?
>
> Eric
>
> Bruce Young wrote:
>
> > Over the last to days the conversation in this forum has been heavily
> > dominiated by conversations regarding disagreements in the DNSO-GA. I, not
> > being a member of that body, have no intention of taking sides on these
> > issue, except to state that this is probably not the correct form for
> > carrying out these conversations.
> >
> > Might I suggest that, rather than using up this forum's bandwidth on what's
> > wrong with the DNSO-GA , we instead turn the conversation back to building
> > the At Large?
> >
> > Bruce Young
> > Portland, Oregon
> > Bruce@barelyadequate.info
> > http://www.barelyadequate.info
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Support democratic control of the Internet!
> > Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de