Re: [atlarge-discuss] (fwd) Urgent input needed for ERC on At-Large ***pleas...

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Richard writes:

<< Alternatively, the participating groups should agree to recognise the
 scale/numbers of their respective memberships.
 
 They should then negotiate (without intervention from Denise Michel) how
 many delegates should be elected to the Committee from each participating
 group. >>

A weighted delegation approach will not best serve the members of this 
organization.  Essentially you have one chapter.  ISOC has 60 "official" 
chapters with another 70 in "chapter-in-formation" status.  They have more 
than 10,000 members... you have not even 1000.  Unless you plan on the ALAC 
being dominated by ISOC to the exclusion of almost every other party, this is 
not a good idea.  There are already 11 ISOC members on the 27-member ALOC 
panel.

PS.  I am a member of ISOC-NY and I support ISOC efforts, but in my view the 
ALAC doesn't require a weighted approach.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de