Re: [atlarge-discuss] (fwd) Urgent input needed for ERC onAt-Large***please respond by Monday morning***

["l.corazon" <l.corazon@prodigy.net>]

Sounds good to me now others input needed. Cordley Coit
Joanna Lane wrote:

> Good idea. I have set up a file that isolates all the replies that arrive
> with this subject header, which I can hand over to the newly elected ExCom.
> Vittorio should be doing this anyway, but he has been known to ignore
> viewpoints that do not agree with his own - it won't hurt to have back-up.
> If anybody changes the suject header, it will miss my filters, so perhaps
> you could keep an eye on that for me?
> Thanks,
> Joanna
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: l.corazon [mailto:l.corazon@prodigy.net]
> > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 11:48 PM
> > To: Joanna Lane
> > Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] (fwd) Urgent input needed for ERC on
> > At-Large***please respond by Monday morning***
> >
> >
> > Membership recall ought to be a high priority on the black and
> > white print along
> > with open books and clear accounting. Could we appoint an interim
> > secretary to
> > take the gush of data in? I am not good at it. Cordley  Coit
> > Joanna Lane wrote:
> >
> > > \Vittorio,
> > > The most important points to make to the ERC are:-
> > >
> > > 1) The ALAC must be more than an association of associations,
> > or it could be
> > > deemed a Trade Association, which is not acceptable.
> > > 2) The ALAC must be run by elected officials. Top down
> > appointment by ICANN
> > > Staff/ former members of the ALSC or even the ERC, is not acceptable.
> > > 3) The ALAC must facilitate representation in the ICANN process by
> > > participation. Any mechanism that seeks to deny direct membership for
> > > individuals is not acceptable.
> > >
> > > It you want to add my name to the list of those willing to
> > assist by email,
> > > I will try to find the time.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Joanna
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Vittorio Bertola [mailto:vb@vitaminic.net]
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 6:52 PM
> > > > To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> > > > Subject: [atlarge-discuss] (fwd) Urgent input needed for ERC
> > on At-Large
> > > > ***please respond by Monday morning***
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > FYI - I just received this as a member of the ALOC:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 15:31:06 -0700, "Denise Michel"
> > > > <denisemichel@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >ICANN's ERC (Evolution and Reform Cmt.) has asked for assistance from
> > > > >members of the At-Large Organizing Committee in filling in
> > the details of
> > > > >the Blue Print for Reform and the Board's subsequent
> > Bucharest Resolution
> > > > >(see
> > > > http://www.icann.org/committees/evol-reform/status-report-15jul02.htm
> > > > >for more information).  Spcifically, the ERC has asked for our
> > > > ideas on how
> > > > >to structure an At-Large Advisory Committee (the ERC also will
> > > > continue to
> > > > >solicit public input on all aspects of reform).  The Board's
> > Bucharest
> > > > >Resolution directs the ERC to "consider the creation of an At
> > > > Large Advisory
> > > > >Committee as a potential vehicle for informed participation in
> > > > ICANN by the
> > > > >broad user community" and the ERC has asked the ALOC to
> > provide initial
> > > > >suggestions on this by ***July 26*** and detailed
> > > > recommendations by August
> > > > >16.  The ERC will then "take account of the input in making its
> > > > >recommendations to the Board and the ICANN community."
> > > > >
> > > > >***Please let me know by Monday morning, July 22 (PDT) if you
> > > > are available
> > > > >to work on this via email (phone if needed) next week.***
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks.
> > > > >Denise
> > > > >
> > > > >Denise Michel
> > > > >denisemichel@sbcglobal.net
> > > > >408.867.1986
> > > > >775.521.0778 (fax)
> > > > >
> > > > >PS.  This aggressive schedule is necessitated by ICANN's
> > > > timeline: "The ERC
> > > > >currently intends to provide a first Interim Implementation
> > Report to the
> > > > >community on or about 1 August 2002, and another such Interim
> > > > Implementation
> > > > >Report on or about 1 September 2002. A final set of ERC
> > Implementation
> > > > >Recommendations will be posted on or about 1 October 2002.
> > The Interim
> > > > >Implementation reports will set forth the ERC's then-current
> > approach to
> > > > >implementation details, and will invite community comment on
> > the matters
> > > > >discussed, probably generally following the format of the various ERC
> > > > >Working Papers that led up to the Blueprint for Reform."  Final
> > > > decisions by
> > > > >the Board are expected at the  Shanghai meeting 27-31 October 2002.
> > > >
> > > > Moreover, a couple of days ago, after the "Status Report" was
> > > > published by the ERC, I contacted privately a couple of Board members
> > > > (the ones with whom we could discuss a little in Bucharest) to ask
> > > > whether the Committee intended to build a specific task force to
> > > > assist it in detailing the feasibility and mechanisms of the ALAC.
> > > > Today I have received an answer that suggests me to discuss proposals
> > > > in the ALOC. I guess that the ALOC will be the main channel the
> > > > Committee will use to gather input from the public on the subject of
> > > > ALAC implementation (though I hope the usual public forums will be
> > > > usable as well).
> > > >
> > > > Of course, given the fact that we're in the middle of an election and,
> > > > as usual, time given is very short, I don't think that we have the
> > > > time to produce an official statement as an organization by July 26.
> > > > However, it seems that there will be up to August 16 to produce "final
> > > > recommendations", and I think the newly elected panel will be more
> > > > legitimate in contributing to them. Anyway I will surely submit some
> > > > personal ideas to the ALOC - and to this list.
> > > > --
> > > > vb.               [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a]
> > bertola.eu.org]<------
> > > > ----------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/
> > <--------------------------
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de