[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] 006 Deciding Name for Organisation
Hans, I don't see why non-ICANN name and restricting our mission to
"promote user representation and participation in DNS management and
Internet governance" are mutually exclusive.
Why do you?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Judith Oppenheimer
http://JudithOppenheimer.com
http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
http://WhoSells800.com
212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Visit 1-800 AFTA, http://www.1800afta.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hans Klein [mailto:hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu]
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:00 PM
> To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] 006 Deciding Name for Organisation
>
>
>
> I think the organization's mission should stay close to ICANN.
>
> Already back in 2000 we started a general forum for Internet
> users: the
> Civil Society Internet Forum (www.csif.net). CSIF played a
> meaningful role
> in the year 2000 elections, most notably in promoting the
> "Civil Society
> Statement." However, some people in the CSIF wanted it to be
> more than
> ICANN. Energies were invested in a loose grab bag of
> activities, and the
> result was a decline in interest.
>
> We should avoid dispersing our own energies too much. Let's keep the
> mission close to something like, "promote user representation and
> participation in DNS management and Internet governance."
>
> Hans
>
>
>
> At 11:46 AM 8/9/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>
> >The name of the organisation itself has t
>
> >o be a fairly urgent "task" to be
> >accomplished and determined by our members. It's linked,
> perhaps, to Mission
> >Statement - as some people may want the name of the
> organisation to reflect
> >a fairly broad mission (I favour this, to broaden membership
> and make us
> >more truly representative) - while others want a narrower technical
> >relationship to ICANN (in which case ICANN-style terms like
> @large may
> >figure... personally I'd prefer we steer clear of this, but I may get
> >outvoted)
> >
> >The reason the name issue is important is because we urgently need to
> >commence "branding" our product, and we need press releases
> etc, and the
> >sooner we have an agreed name the better.
> >
> >I'll kick this one off by arguing the case for a broad
> emotive name which
> >will capture the imagination of the public and the media -
> and support
> >outreach to a broad membership. So I'm against yet another acronym or
> >collection of letters. I personally dislike the mention of
> @large because
> >here in UK and many other places it means virtually nothing
> to ordinary
> >people. Here in UK the only things that are described as at large are
> >escaped prisoners and dangerous wild animals.
> >
> >So I favour the use of broad emotive titles. From my own
> domains I can
> >offer:
> >
> >www.TheVoiceofThePeople.com
> >
> >which would sum up the representational character of our
> work and the focus
> >on democracy and ordinary people. Unfortunately the .org
> isn't available
> >
> >www.InternetParliament.com and www.TheInternetParliament.com
> >
> >and I've also got one of the .orgs for that - OK it's a bit British
> >sounding, but everyone knows what a parliament is. I admit
> I'm not sure if
> >either of these two work ... they're just what I've got
> >
> >You want something like "Internet For All" or "Internet
> Nation" or whatever.
> >Clearly you can be constrained by available domain names.
> >
> >I also favour keeping the @Large name as a sub-name on all
> websites, to
> >position ourselves clearly in the @Large role in our demands
> for seats on
> >the ICANN Board. I think we can refer to ourselves again and again as
> >"Worldwide@Large" as an identity we claim by right of the scale of
> >representation we achieve. A twofold approach to our use of
> names and terms
> >might work.
> >
> >What processes do we apply to decide our name, and decide it
> soon? Do we
> >make a list of all proposed names in this thread? Then do we ask the
> >membership to vote from ??? 20 ??? suggestions. Then if
> there's no clear
> >consensus, do we re-vote on the top 2 or 3?
> >
> >Ideas?
> >
> >Richard
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>
> >To: <espresso@e-scape.net>; <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> >Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:20 AM
> >Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] RE: [atlarge-panel] Fw:
> [atlarge-discuss]
> >ALOC
> >
> >
> > > > The big thing is for our Panel and anyone we delegate to
> > > > participate in a particular discussion on our behalf to remember
> > > > that they don't (at least, don't yet) have a mandate to *speak
> > > > for* the membership. >
> > >
> > > My understanding is that the Panel may delegate representatives to
> >relevant
> > > fora as observers, but these individuals have no advocacy
> role without a
> > > mandate from the membership. At this moment in time we have 3
> > > representatives in the ALOC. That's all. Personally, I
> would like to see
> > > delegates in every fora, not only in observer capacity,
> but as advocates,
> > > including every ICANN Task Force, but as others have
> said, if we resolve
> >one
> > > issue per week, we are doing well.
> > >
> > > It would be helpful to have feedback from the membership
> on what policy
> > > issues they would like to address first. The Panel is
> working on a list of
> > > suggestions.
> > >
> > > Joanna
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> >For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de