RE: [atlarge-discuss] icannatlarge.com

["Bruce Young" <bruce@barelyadequate.info>]

James Love wrote:

|  Where is the info on the vote on the web page?   I don't think
|  the web page
|  is being used very effectively, if info on an ongoing vote isn't
|  linked to
|  the 1st page.

Indeed.  The "Latest News" is the results of our Panel election months ago!

I thought Sotiris had volunteered to relieve Joop of his Webmaster burden.
Where are we on that?


Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon USA
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!


|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: [mailto:james.love@cptech.org]
|  Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 7:14 AM
|  To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
|  Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] icannatlarge.com
|
|
|  Where is the info on the vote on the web page?   I don't think
|  the web page
|  is being used very effectively, if info on an ongoing vote isn't
|  linked to
|  the 1st page.    Jamie
|
|
|  Vittorio Bertola wrote:
|  > On 24 Sep 2002 10:55:38 -0000, you wrote:
|  >
|  >
|  >>now. Assuming in all fairness that it never occurred to anyone at
|  >>that time, and that it is purely coincidental that such
|  >>realization came only at a crucial time as the vote, the people
|  >>concerned (the ones who fear prosecution, persecution, etc.) may
|  >>kindly step down and aside, so the work of the organization goes
|  >>on unhindered.
|  >
|  >
|  > I personally agree. I think that, at this time, there is no
|  real risk of
|  > legal implications for anyone; I think we should reconsider
|  this only in
|  > view of a "cease and desist" letter from ICANN or other sign
|  that ICANN is
|  > not happy with our use of their name, and only after trying a
|  negotiation
|  > with them. If any member or panel member is not happy to take
|  this risk...
|  > well, being part of an organization, especially if in positions of
|  > responsibility, means that you have to take the risks together with the
|  > honours. If you're not available to accept your responsibilities, you
|  > shouldn't be there in the first place.
|  >
|  > As I already told a number of times, I think that this whole
|  issue is only
|  > risking to derail our organization and to blow it up. This is
|  why we should
|  > focus on proceeding - for example, on sorting out the web and
|  lists issues
|  > so that working groups can start to actually work.
|  >
|  > So: might we please know the results of the vote on the name,
|  and proceed?
|
|
|  --
|  ------
|  James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
|  http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
|  voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
|
|
|
|  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|  To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
|  For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
|


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de