Re: [atlarge-discuss] Name vote

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Ron and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,

Ron Sherwood wrote:

>    Good evening, Jeff:
>
>     I have taken the liberty of interspersing my responses to your
> message.

  Please do...

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
> To: "Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>
> Cc: "IAL" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Name vote
>
>
> > Ron and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,
> >
> >   Ron, if you had been paying attention, instead of slurring
> > myself and disrupting this forum,



>
>
>     I have no recollection of slurring you, Jeff.  If you feel that
> something I have written applies to you, that must be your judgement,
> not mine.

Yes you did Ron.  See:
http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-discuss/0209/msg00575.html

>
>
> >you would have noticed that
> > most of the information that you are asking for here was posted
> here:
> > http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-discuss/0209/msg00528.html
>
>     I thought that I was paying attention. Perhaps I was just
> disrupting the forum instead.

  Perhaps so.  It would at least seems so...

>
>
>     However, having re-read the post at the link you provided, I am
> unable to find the answers to any of the questions that I asked.  You
> are obviously far better at this sort of thing than I, so perhaps you
> would post the apropriate answers for me.  I am sure that you must
> have access to this unpublished information.

  I have not access to any unpublished information on this subject area.

The answers to ALL of your questions are not in the link provided.
But most of those answers are.  Did you happen to read it closely
Ron?  If so, than I can only surmise that you misread it or missed
something unintentionally.  If not, please read the link/archived
post again.

>
>
> Regards, Ron
>
> > Ron Sherwood wrote:
> >
> > >    Good afternoon, Walter:
> > >
> > >     Is it possible for us to know the actual poll results for our
> Name
> > > vote?
> > >
> > >     For example, what percentage of the ballot recipients actually
>
> > > voted?
> > >
> > >     Did a majority of voters really vote for icannatlarge.org, or
> was
> > > there a run-off due to the fact that less than 50% of the voters
> > > wanted any one of the choices?
> > >
> > >     If there was a run-off, did the majority derived from the
> second
> > > choices become immediately apparent, or was there a second run-off
> to
> > > determine the outcome?
> > >
> > >     Were the highest number of 1st choice votes for
> icannatlarge.org
> > > or for another name?
> > >
> > >     What was the second most popular choice?
> > >
> > >     How close was the initial count?
> > >
> > >     Thank you in advance for these answers.
> > >
> > > Sincerely, Ron Sherwood
>
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de