Re: [atlarge-discuss] Our New Name Isn't...

[Walter Schmidt <walts@dorsai.org>]

   ...what I don't understand

When during the name-process, it was brought to our attention by a Panel
member that we might have a problem with one of the five names - all kinds
of traffic was generated that attributed negative meanings to that action.

But, when after the name-process, we find that our choice, which we were
told by one of the Panel was held free and clear, isn't - and that that
information is not immediately brought to our attention - it would seem no
questions are being asked about why the delay, and the fact that had we
known there was a problem - that name would have been removed from the
list as one of the requirements to be on the ballot was to be freely
available.

What I don't understand is why there is no out cry to invalidate the
ballot results due to that information not being shared with us.

A double standard? A deliberate action? A hidden agenda?

Maybe, but surely not a clear and transparent action!

Yet no one questions why?

Why!
  

 --- REgards, walts@dorsai.org Walter C. Schmidt, IT CPA  Blue(.) ---
 - -              Online since CompuServe's MicroNET           ^  --- 
 - -        Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Media Center Edition       - -
 ---                Associate Expert - Expert Zone                ---
 - -        http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/        ---
 - - 52 Ken          http://www.dorsai.org/~walts/         Sun 57 - -
  


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de