Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [wg-web] Re: [atlarge-discuss] Opening of the WG-Web mailing list

["J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

Dear Stephen,
this is some frustration by someone who suffered a lot of frustrations on 
this issue. Today we have a situation where the WG-Web acting chair has no 
access to the site, nor even relations with the Webmaster, where the 
registered owners do not know how to update the site DNS, where no one 
knows how the site works. So let keep calm and relax.

1. let try to have it working. Tim proposed to do that. I am sure Hans will 
help.
2. let have a WG-Web chair and devise a quick charter and have it approved 
by the Panel
3. let have members of the WG-Web taking responsbility for some pages of 
the site
    - forum
    - user registration
    - special topics
    - mailing lists
    - panelist support
    and update procedures adopted together with an internal linking 
strategy to permit security.

The tension we met was not needed. We want to achieve somehing together. 
Notto just dispute over by-laws, quick and dirty sites, and ICANN :-)

Look at Sotiris beautyfull site on Greeck Philosophy. It would be great if 
he picked the News Page. But we need a procedure to have the things clean, 
simple, workable.
All this takes time.
cheers.
jfc

jfc


At 19:58 30/10/02, Stephen Waters wrote:

> Jamie,
>
> I think this is just in response to the current level of [neglect?
> disorganization? not-set-up-edness?]. I gather it's more of an
> accountability-focused committee (currently) and will gradually narrow
> its focus to being a place to talk about technical concerns, ideas, and
> frustrations... but only after a sufficient level of accountability is
> reached.
>
> I agree with the minimalist approach for the most part (just fire them
> if they do a lousy job), but I think there is some call for
> procedure/policy on official website content so that we actually know
> what constitutes a lousy job.
>
> -s
>
> On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 07:14, James Love wrote:
> > Ok people.  After we have dozens or hundreds of people on the committee to
> > manage the web site, what next?  Isn't this pretty silly?  Can anyone 
> point
> > to even one organization that has a similiar structure to manage an
> > organization web site?   Maybe we need to grow up a bit and think about 
> what
> > we are trying to manage.   Jamie
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 230 - Release Date: 24/10/02
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de