[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[atlarge-discuss] Re: ELECTIONS
Dear Claude,
At 16:05 16/02/03, claude.thielet wrote:
Jefsey,
from direct talks and from your post, I understand that the
mandate of the Panelists is going to be:
- to manage the website
- to manage the Members list
- to incorporate where they have been told
- to enter into MoUs with who wants to start a party, a
service, an action, or with exsiting organizations like
Jamie's or Hans' or YJ's and even with ICANN, subject to
Membership approval
Yes. In keeping at low level (Membership List and Website) the flexibility
is maximum. Panel has shown to be extremely limited in its capacity for
action: actions are to be carried by the organizations the Panel will enter
into an MoU with (DPF, Danny, Joop etc..).
Can you confirm?
Yes.
I suggest that this mandate is clearly
detailed in the polling booth vote description so there is no
ambiguity.
Seems a good idea to me. I suggest Joop picks your words.
Also, that you want that they have a voting system that
everyone may watch (and see what they do). I would suggest
that they are removed if they do not take part into the votes.
I think this should be decided by the Panel itself, but sounds
in line with the public commitment I wish from them. Actually
it could be added to it. Experience has shown that male
Panelists "faded away", not being involved, respondng less
and less. A clear cut departure as for our two ladies is better.
jfc
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.454 / Virus Database: 253 - Release Date: 10/02/03
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de