Thanks for this effort, Jan.
-s
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 09:02, Jan Siren wrote:
> This is an update on my comparison of the two parallel icannatlarge
> membership lists, begun a week ago. As I mentioned, I compared the
> icannatlarge.com membership list ("Joop's list"), which in the form made
> available to me contained name/location items, and was nominally
> chronological (but containing no address nor date fields), and the
> icannatlarge.org mailing list, ("Vittorio's list") containing name/address
> items (but no location nor date fields), also nominally chronological. I had
> thought that each list lacked a significant number of entries that the other
> contained. I have gone through both lists and have determined that
> out-of-order entries account for nearly all the discrepancies, apart from the
> previously-mentioned 30 at the end of Vittorio's list that Joop's list didn't
> have. As closely as I can determine, Joop's list has 4 legitimate entries
> that Vittorio's does not, conversely 8 legitimate entries that Vittorio's has
> that Joop's does not. So my best estimate for the aggregate of all entries
> from both lists, if such a master list were created, would be about 1076.
>
> I am unable to to the aggregation (name, location, address) except for those
> entries common to both lists. Nor, as previously mentioned, do I have the
> resources to do so. For completeness, the master list should contain also,
> for each entry, the date of origination and the willingness of the person
> named to contribute financially (which Joop's list has).
>
> This will be my last posting until the end of the week because of business
> travel.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part