[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] Impersonal processes Re: [Fwd: [atlarge-discuss] WHAT MOSTMEMBERS WANT]
Richard Henderson wrote:
| In order for that to happen, there has to be definition of the
| specific work
| we want achieved - and I really believe that definition can only
| be arrived
| at by the sanction (and participation) of the broad membership.
I totally agree. That was the my motivation to request questions from the
mem,bership that we can include on the ballot. That way we not only get a
new panel, but we also get an idea of the will of the membership that they
can use to focus their actions.
| So I advocate: elections (with a built in accountability to the
| membership) --- polling to define needs and objectives --- then
| the priority
| of carrying out those objectives, preferably tied down to agreed time
| limits.
I agree.
Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon USA
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de