Re: [atlarge-discuss] POLLING COMMITTEE: Reporting Audited Results

[Walter Schmidt <walts@dorsai.org>]

Folks -

So as to have it included in the "record," and in case in the future there
is ever a question as to "who," by their silence, acquiesced to the
accuracy and completeness of the process we used, and to the lack of any
errors or irregularities resulting from the process or in the results
reported...

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, J-F C. (Jefsey)  Morfin wrote:

> There has been no opposition from voters.

   ...I recall otherwise


> The simplification and the security resulting from the adopted method
> has obviously not been fully understood by many yet. Nor its
> transparency.

   ...as an attestation expert, who fully understands what I was told
about the process used, and based on that information and my understanding
of it, what we did does not ensure only valid voters voted, and that the
votes tallied are as was voted - the process's accuracy and completeness
was not fully controlled, as a complex process that cannot be manually
re-created, the process's accuracy and completeness and the lack of any
errors or irregularities is, therefore, and remains, an unknown.

--

 ---  REgards, walts@dorsai.org  Walter C. Schmidt, IT CPA  Blue(^) ---
 - -   Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Media Center Edition - HPMC 873n  ---
 - -                 Associate Expert - Expert Zone                 - -
 ---         http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/         ---
 - - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/columns/schmidt/ ---
 - - 52 Ken           http://www.dorsai.org/~walts/          Sun 57 - -


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de