[atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Ah Here is the New TLDs Evaluation Process...

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Joanna and all former DNSO GA members an other interested Parties,

  Your right IMHO here Joanna.  But also as  you know this
nonsense from Roberto is just more of the same sing-song
Ding-dong that ICANN BoD and Staff members along with
a small handful of their Parrots have been doing sense 1999.
You know it, I know it, they know it and what really
matters is that the DOC/NTIA knows it and yet
seems to wish to ignore or side step it for reason or
reasons yet to be completely understood.
Consensus of the stakeholders/users be dammed I suppose...  :/

Joanna Lane wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roberto Gaetano [mailto:ploki_xyz@hotmail.com]
> > So ICANN Directors and other officials cannot express personal opinions?
> > That's weird!
>
> Roberto,
> A personal opinion is no substitute for a proper answer. In this case, an
> ICANN Director has patronized the complainant by expressing sympathy, but in
> the same breath has absolved himself absolutely from taking any
> responsibility for actually doing anything about it, citing "personal
> opinion". This does absolutely nothing to answer the very serious questions
> raised in Richard's position paper about the TLD Evaluation process, which
> adversely effects failed applicants to the sum of several hundreds of
> thousands of dollars. The point is, what are the ICANN Director's proposing
> to do about it apart from express personal opinions?
>
> > I see the benefit of reading the personal opinion of Mr. Palage
> > (of course,
> > in stating this I talk in my personal capacity, not as Interim
> > ALAC Member
> > ;>), and therefore I will not engage the ALAC position on the
> > matter, if you
> > allow me to do so). The alternative is to stop communicating altogether:
> > what will be the benefit, and for whom?
>
> No, the choice is not simply giving personal opinions, or not communicating
> at all. For goodness sake, you people have been appointed to positions of
> responsibility. You are answerable to the community, and that means
> justifying polices that have been imposed from the top down with more than a
> "personal opinion". Expecting an official response from an ICANN Director is
> not an unreasonable expectation, and what's weird is that you seem to think
> the ALAC and ICANN Board can dictate terms that more often than not go
> completely against community consensus, then distance yourself from failures
> that result.
>
> >
> > Incidentally, this is not the only forum available to the public, and
> > Michael did not call any press conference, he was only kind enough to
> > provide an opinion on an issue raised by a member of this mailing list.
>
> > Maybe things should be put in the right perspective...
>
> Yes, I think I've done that now.
> Joanna
>
> >
> > Regards
> > Roberto
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de