Re: [atlarge-discuss] Proposal: How to Replace Panel Members...

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Jeff H., and all fellow members,

Jeff Holt wrote:

> Yes, all well and true.  But the answer is still "Yes, the Panel is to
> blame for revisiting a question that has already been answered by the
> membership."

 To your remarks above I say HERE HERE!

>  Just because there are a variety of opinions on the Panel,
> there is no need to reach "consensus" due to the fact that the answer
> was previously made known by the polling results.

  We have not legitimate Panel nor do we have a legitimate
election/Polling Process to date.  The Jefsey-election
farce was just that, a farce or maybe even a fraud.
As such, again we have no method by which to
accurately measure Consensus or the members.

> Move on to the more
> urgent needs of Web, Incorporation and By-Laws.  If some "cannot accept"
> the will of the Membership as previously expressed, they are free to
> step down or aside. Lead, follow, or get the heck out of the way.

  To this above I also say HERE HERE!

>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Jeff Holt
> Jefftttt@txucom.net
> www.tejas-info-services.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gilbert Estillore Lumantao [mailto:gilbert.lumantao@lycos.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:41 AM
> To: Atlarge Discuss List; Walter Schmidt
> Cc: Walter Schmidt
> Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] Proposal: How to Replace Panel Members...
>
> please consider this.
>
> there are some in the panel who think that, in case of vacancy, the
> candidates who garnered the next number of votes in the elections be
> deemed elected.
>
> there are some who are not in favor of this and yet acknowledge that the
> result of the poll incorporated in the past election indicate that the
> membership chose this method.
>
> still, there are others in the panel who think that the mandate (step
> up) is not very clear or conclusive. there are others also who simply
> cannot accept this method. in fact, there are some who favor not to
> replace vacancies and instead reduce the size of the panel.
>
> now, there has been no vote on this but i can very well sense that there
> is no consensus. in a situation like this, can you blame us if we throw
> this matter back to the members?
>
> gilbert
> ---
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de