RE: [atlarge-discuss] Update on Status of affairs per 6 July 2003

["Abel Wisman" <abel@able-towers.com>]

In regards to your questions and remarks:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Holt [mailto:jefftttt@txucom.net] 
> Sent: 06 July 2003 20:24
> Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] Update on Status of affairs 
> per 6 July 2003

> http://mailman.icannatlarge.org/pipermail/panel/2003-July/000884.html 
> The rotation was never a great idea, dispense with it and 
> elect a Chair among those who ACTUASLLY show up!  And why has 
> there been not further action on the replacement of the 
> Missing Panelists???  

A. the panel decides on how it will fill the position of the chair
amongst them, such is our privelige which thus far has been uncontested,
any problems therefore with our ideas will be worked out amongst the
panel.
B. Only the membership has a right to take action against panel-members
under whatever circumstances, such is one of the ankers of democracy, if
panelmembers could be ousted by other panelmembers capture would be the
result within days.
I suppose that once a vote of no confidence is called for by a
representative amount of members we will have to organize a vote as such
for whatever panel member(s) you wish to vote upon.
 
> Another travesty lurking..... 
> http://mailman.icannatlarge.org/pipermail/pane>
l/2003-July/000887.html 
> Will this Working Group (WG) be stacked in the same manner as 
> the Web committee???  ON RECORD now, I "volunteer" to work on 
> this Articles of Incorporation/By-Laws WG....

Why not read a motion before you try and raise the hords? Not only is
the remark on the webcomm outdated by far, it shows far more that
reading is not a generally acquired skill: <quote> "That the wg shall be
composed of volunteer Panel members as well as volunteers from the
general membership."</quote> No comm has as yet been stacked and why you
would want to volunteer to be on a comm that might be a "travesty
lurking" is not really comprehensible.
It also seems you have more time on your hands then most of us have to
live, seeing as you want to be on the webteam, the moderation team and
now the WG on By-Laws, you gonna be busy!

http://mailman.icannatlarge.org/pipermail/panel/2003-July/000849.html 
The panel rift widens...  Seems the ONLY time some participate is to
ARGUE AGAINST... and the very first motion on the table is STILL being
voted on?? Seems a bit out of order to move ahead when prior motions are
still pending outcome...  though I don't mind multi-tasking a bit,
finish this up soon so more faith may be placed in those who actually DO
some work on the Panel, like Abel, Hugh, and others who have voted on
every motion applicable to date.

If you do not like the attitude or opinion of some panel-members then
address these panelmembers, not the motion or the discussion. This
motion was changed several times and it's voting is nearly ended. The
status of affairs shows you such, hence I made it.

http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-discuss/0306/msg01749.html 
For verification of my prior volunteering for the Web Committee, this
should be sufficient evidence.  In addition, the topic has been one of
those I make it a point to comment upon, clearly showing my interest. 

This has been corrected though up and untill now you did not reply to
mails on the topic.


Kind regards

Abel




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de