[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] Tinkerers' champion
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] Tinkerers' champion
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:17:06 +0200
- Comments: Sender has elected to use 8-bit data in this message. If problems arise, refer to postmaster at sender's site.
- Delivered-To: mailing list debate@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact debate-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: NONE
- Priority: normal
http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1176171
------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------
LAST WORD
Tinkerers' champion
Jun 20th 2002
>From The Economist print edition
It is not just libertarians who are concerned about the restrictions
caused by America's latest copyright law. Edward Felten, a professor
at Princeton University, argues that the “freedom to tinker”—the
right to understand, repair and modify one's own equipment— is
crucial to innovation, and as valuable to society as the freedom of
speech.
[...]
Another issue is licensing. Consumers assume that they own products
once they have paid for them. But increasingly, they are only
licensing them. This is the case with most shrink-wrapped software
bought in stores and with software downloaded from developers'
websites. Either you accept to license, not own, the product when you
click the “I accept” button at the end of those screenfuls of
legalese or you cannot use it. But the same is true for an increasing
number of devices, such as Internet appliances. Suppliers of such
gadgets could use licences to prohibit any tinkering. Should
consumers, Dr Felten asks, be encouraged to bargain away their
freedom to tinker?
Dr Felten is the first to admit that his arguments are not yet
focused enough. He intends to write a book about the topic when he is
back at Princeton. The treatise on tinkering is certain to find avid
readers—especially among the millions who spend countless hours
playing with their computers, cars and cameras.
It would be a surprise if they did not put up a fight. Many are
preparing to do so already. Protests are being voiced with increasing
vigour against a bill recently introduced in Congress by Senator
Fritz Hollings of South Carolina, on behalf of Disney and other media
giants, requiring a piracy-detection system to be built into all
digital entertainment devices. If the legislation passes, critics
warn that personal computers would become nothing more than a costly
but entirely dumb machine for playing DVDs.
The bill could also criminalise open-source software, such as the
increasingly popular operating system, Linux. Copy-protection systems
usually come with proprietary software that is hidden or cannot be
altered—something that no self-respecting open-source hacker would
integrate into a program. No wonder all those who care about
innovation—the freedom to tinker and create new ways of doing
things—are up in arms.
------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de