[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: AW: [ICANN-EU] LA @large meeting preparation
- To: "Giampaolo Bonora" <bnrb08k1@bo.nettuno.it>, <icann-europe@fitug.de>
- Subject: AW: AW: [ICANN-EU] LA @large meeting preparation
- From: SchultzKom@t-online.de (Christian Schultz Kommunalberatung)
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 22:34:01 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <0ppl0t0mepkvd6sr9anr93j7pinopa0vpc@4ax.com>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Dear Giampolo and all,,
I understand your thoughts, but please donīt forget those members who still
havnīt got their Pin. I am convinced that the board should decide to give
out new Pins for every member to stop this unhappy discussion who has been
responsable for this 50%-election.
Best regards
Christian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de [mailto:owner-icann-europe@fitug.de]Im
Auftrag von Giampaolo Bonora
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. November 2000 19:06
An: icann-europe@fitug.de
Betreff: Re: AW: [ICANN-EU] LA @large meeting preparation
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 14:09:43 +0100, SchultzKom@t-online.de (Christian
Schultz Kommunalberatung) wrote:
>Dear Jefsey and dear Thomas,
>
>I agree to your propositions. What is necessary that every @Large-member
>should receive a new Pin. Itīs still miracolous that half of us hadnīt got
>or activated their Pin. To create a nearly democratic basis this should be
>repaired at once.
>
The present PIN could be allow some features, as communicate with
elected directors, providing to maintain low the "privilege" of lucky
owners of it, _and_ providing to indicate a near date to reopen
membership registration. Every voting procedure should be done with
new or newly validated PINs.
The new form could ask applicant members about his/her privacy
requests on e-mail and postal addressess, while now I'm not in favor
to give these data outside, in any form - except to the eventual
Regional offices, under strict omogeneity rules (because this is a
matter of rights, not organisation).
I too agree to other Jefsey's and Thomas-Jeannette propositions.
Best regards,
giampaolo bonora