[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[atlarge-discuss] RE: [ALSC-Forum] icannatlarge.com security issue
- To: "ALSC Forum" <forum@atlargestudy.org>, "At-Large Discussion List" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Subject: [atlarge-discuss] RE: [ALSC-Forum] icannatlarge.com security issue
- From: "Bruce Young" <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 00:40:29 -0700
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <3CDC73D1.2020104@cerebalaw.com>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
William S. Lovell wrote:
>Question is, though, should we do a #2 in ga@dnso.org, in icannatlarge.com,
or both?
Why not both. I have no objection with DNSO-GA members also being At Large
members, as long as the leave their DNSO issues at the door for the extent
of their stay!
Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon
Bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!