[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] New name for Icannatlarge.com
- To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] New name for Icannatlarge.com
- From: "Bruce Young" <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 18:31:20 -0700
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <00cc01c1f903$07458820$105bfc3e@r6yll>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
Richard Henderson wrote:
>I personally like neither ICANN nor At Large as part of our name. (This is
one of the few things I disagree with Bruce Young >about!)
You're allowed! :)
My reason *for* the "At Large" moniker is driven by the same source, but in
a different environment (the US vs. the UK): The tech press here
recognizes it (to the little extent it does!), and losing it would lose us
what little recognition we have today. That's very little, I grant you, but
little is better than none!
>I take the view that in order not to be subsumed and marginalised by ICANN
we need the authority of scale, and we need to >broaden our mission and our
membership by popularising our message and going for large scale outreach in
all regions.
Agreed. This has to be a "world party" or it doesn't work.
>I take the view that to occupy a narrow and obscure corner of the debate,
and to embrace a limited mission with a limited >name, will (a) attract
limited numbers (b) be easier for ICANN to fend off or marginalise.
I don't disagree here. That's why I called for replacing "ICANN" in our
name with "Internet Users."
>I therefore favour more generic names along these lines (not saying they
are specifically the right ones, but to give some >idea of the direction I
think we should take in the organisation's name):
Democratic Control; Democratic Assembly; Democratic Internet; Internet
Democracy Movement; or The Internet Parliament (which I've registered); or
PeopleWorldWide (which Bill Lovell has registered)
Of these, I like Internet Democracy Movement the best. In fact I like it
better than Internet Users At Large! It succintly describes our intent
*and* our methods!
>I take the view that the mandate of the Interim Panel expires after 12
weeks and that if possible we should press forward
>more urgently.
I agree. We need to hit the ground running!
Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon
Bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de